Digger 1440x1080 1

Pressure Mounts on US Heavy Equipment Manufacturers

America’s machinery manufacturers have raised red flags over escalating tariff costs, reinforcing growing concern across the manufacturing sector.

With supply chains spanning the US, Europe, Mexico and China, heavy equipment manufacturers are experiencing firsthand how volatile trade policy is impacting cross-border operations, logistics flows and profitability.

Despite their strong domestic production footprints, manufacturers rely on global imports for key components—especially from Europe and China. These imports, once routine, have become financial pressure points in the wake of rising duties and retaliatory tariffs.

One leading manufacturer is forecasting up to $350 million in tariff expenses this quarter alone, while another expects annual tariff-related costs to top $500 million.

The problem isn’t just confined to import charges. Export volumes are also under pressure, as shifting trade dynamics alter demand patterns and reduce competitiveness in overseas markets.

North America-Centric, Globally Exposed
Two leading manufacturers source more than 75% of their components from within the United States, but their supply chains extend well beyond national borders. Equipment parts arrive from factories and suppliers across Canada, Europe and Latin America and a substantial proportion of inputs still come from Asia, most notably China.

With a growing share of international trade now subject to unpredictable tariffs, even these diversified sourcing strategies offer limited insulation. One manufacturer, for example, cited that half of its projected tariff costs stem from Chinese imports alone.

Even the recent 90-day tariff easing between the US and China, announced on 14 May, is unlikely to provide lasting relief. As one executive warned, the long-term environment remains uncertain: “Many mitigation strategies require clarity and certainty on tariffs, but the landscape is too volatile to act decisively.”

Sales are already reflecting these pressures. In the second quarter, one company reported a 16% drop in total revenue and a 23% fall in construction and forestry equipment sales. Its peer, reporting for Q1, posted a 10% decline in total revenue, with construction equipment hit hardest, down 19%.

Strategic Logistics Support from Metro
Metro works with world-leading manufacturers and understands the complexities of global equipment supply chains. Whether moving machinery from US heartlands like Illinois and Texas, or coordinating inbound component flows from Europe, Canada, Mexico or China, Metro helps manufacturers manage risk, maintain continuity, and adapt quickly.

We manage high-and-heavy, breakbulk and RoRo shipments across key corridors, with logistics and customs services designed specifically for industrial equipment movements. 

  • End-to-end customs expertise, including tariff classification, valuation, and compliance guidance
  • Integrated transport planning, enabling smarter decisions on routing, modal shifts, and consolidation
  • Support for North American, European and Asia-Pacific flows, backed by local teams and global visibility
  • Proactive trade advisory services, keeping clients informed and prepared as policies evolve

As political negotiations reshape tariff regimes and global supply chains remain under strain, manufacturers with international exposure need more than reactive logistics. They need strategic, agile partners that will future-proof their supply chains, reduce friction across borders, and protect performance in the face of mounting uncertainty.

EMAIL Managing Director, Andrew Smith, to discuss how Metro can support your global logistics strategy.

COSCO appoint Metro partner

US Port Fees on Chinese-Built Vessels

The United States Trade Representative (USTR) has finalised a revised plan to impose port fees on Chinese-built containerships calling at US ports.

This follows the reintroduction of the SHIPS for America Act, part of President Donald Trump’s broader push to revive the US shipbuilding industry and reduce reliance on Chinese maritime infrastructure.

While significantly less disruptive than the original February proposal, which threatened to add up to $1.5 million per port call and cost the industry $24 billion, the revised version will still increase shipping costs by approximately $1 million per voyage. These added costs may have ripple effects across global supply chains.

What’s Changing – and When?

USTR Port Fee

  • Start Date: Mid-October 2025
  • Escalation: Costs will increase every 180 days over a three-year period
  • Estimated Additional Costs:
    • Chinese operators (e.g. COSCO/OOCL): USD $250–$1,600 per TEU
    • Non-Chinese operators using China-built vessels: USD $100–$400 per TEU

Crucially, carriers will only be charged once per US rotation, not at every port call. Exemptions apply for:

  • Vessels under 4,000 TEUs
  • Voyages under 2,000 nautical miles
  • China-built vessels owned by US-based carriers

Carrier Reactions and Supply Chain Impacts
Most non-Chinese carriers are expected to redeploy tonnage to avoid the fees, shifting Chinese-built vessels away from US trades in favour of non-Chinese built ships. Some may elect to use transhipment hubs in the Caribbean to bypass direct calls to US ports.

Chinese carriers like COSCO and OOCL will be hardest hit. With limited ability to avoid the charges, these carriers may lean more heavily on alliance partners like CMA CGM or Evergreen, potentially distorting market dynamics and reducing competition on some transpacific routes.

Despite initial fears, widespread surcharges are currently seen as unlikely. Market competition and alternative capacity could prevent many carriers from passing costs directly onto shippers, tthough selective route-specific or carrier-specific fees may still emerge.

SHIPS for America Act
This proposed legislation, while not yet passed, aims to further penalise Chinese-built, -owned or -registered vessels. It also opens the door for other “countries of concern” to be added in future. No cost estimates have been released, but shippers should remain alert to potential follow-on impacts.

The evolving policy landscape introduces fresh uncertainty for importers and exporters, especially those with supply chains linked to Asia–US routes.

Metro is actively monitoring developments and engaging with carriers and industry bodies to stay ahead of the real-time implications. Our goal is to help customers navigate any changes smoothly and make informed decisions.

If your business could be affected by these measures, or you simply want to future-proof your supply chain with revised routing strategies and updated landed cost assessments, please EMAIL our Managing Director, Andrew Smith.

Cathay tailfins 1440x1080 1

March Airfreight Surge Sets Stage for Further Growth as US-China Trade Tensions Ease

Airfreight markets posted a record performance in March, with particularly strong activity on Asia, US, Europe and UK trade lanes. The surge, driven by shippers front-loading cargo ahead of anticipated US tariffs, has provided a benchmark for what could follow in the months ahead as recent tariff reductions between the US and China hint at a renewed spike in activity.

According to IATA, global demand measured in cargo tonne-kilometres rose by 4.4% year-on-year, with international cargo traffic increasing by 5.5%. Capacity, meanwhile, increased by a similar margin, helping to stabilise load factors despite the sudden surge in volumes. Asia-Pacific carriers led growth with a 9.6% rise in demand and an 11% increase in available capacity. North American airlines recorded a 9.5% increase in volumes, while European carriers posted a more moderate rise.

Asia-North America remained the largest and fastest-growing trade lane by market share, as exporters sought to avoid the sharp rise in tariffs. The Europe-North America route also experienced strong activity and was the busiest overall in March, underpinned by steady intra-European demand which grew by 2%.

The operating environment provided further stimulus, with world industrial output and global trade volumes expanding by just under 3%. Falling energy costs provided additional support, with jet fuel prices down for the ninth consecutive month. Inflation rates also stabilised across key markets, providing additional certainty for international shippers. China’s deflationary environment also showed signs of softening, with the rate improving to just below zero.

The result was a sharp escalation in demand from sectors that rely on rapid supply chains and cannot risk ocean freight delays. Electronics, high fashion, automotive and perishable goods were among the leading commodities contributing to the increased volumes.

The extraordinary March performance may not remain an isolated event. The recent temporary US-China tariff reduction has the potential to trigger another wave of increased airfreight activity.

While the extent of future growth will depend on how negotiations between the world’s two largest economies unfold, the easing of tariffs has already bolstered market sentiment.

However, market analysts note that after the March peak, demand may return to more typical seasonal levels in the short term, particularly as capacity has increased by over 6% on international routes, offering more space for shippers. Yet, the fundamental reliance on airfreight for high-value and time-critical shipments between Asia, the US, Europe and the UK remains unchanged.

Should trade relations between the US and China continue to thaw, the market could be poised for another significant uplift in volumes. The key will be whether the current political stability translates into sustained confidence among exporters and freight forwarders across these critical trade lanes.

With airfreight demand surging and tariffs in flux, now is the time to optimise your supply chain strategy. EMAIL Elliot Carlile, Operations Director, to explore how we can help you secure space and streamline your international shipments.

Houthis 1440x1080 1

Trump’s Red Sea Gambit

A dramatic shift in the Red Sea shipping crisis may be underway following US President Donald Trump’s announcement that Houthi militants have agreed to halt their campaign against commercial vessels.

His declaration has sparked hopes of restored freedom of navigation through one of the world’s most vital maritime corridors. However, conflicting signals from the Houthis and persistent security concerns leave the industry navigating uncertain waters.

Trump’s comments, made ahead of a high-profile meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney on May 6, suggested that after months of military escalation, a breakthrough had been reached. The President claimed that the Houthis had “capitulated” and would cease missile and drone strikes on commercial shipping. He pledged that US airstrikes on Yemeni targets would also end in response.

Omani diplomatic sources have echoed the ceasefire narrative, pointing to coordinated discussions that purportedly yielded a de-escalation agreement and a commitment to non-aggression on both sides.

Yet, the Houthis have swiftly rejected Trump’s portrayal, asserting that no formal truce exists. According to Houthi representatives, the group’s military stance remains unchanged, particularly in relation to Israel, and any pause in attacks was a tactical decision rather than the result of concessions.

This ambiguity undermines confidence among major container lines, many of which continue to avoid Red Sea routes due to crew safety concerns and inflated insurance premiums.

If hostilities genuinely subside, container carriers could begin rerouting vessels back through the Suez Canal. Around 10% of global container capacity has been absorbed by the longer, costlier voyages around southern Africa. A return to Suez would free up this latent capacity, potentially exacerbating overcapacity issues already pressuring the industry. With the container vessel order book standing at about a quarter of the current fleet size, the market faces mounting risk of supply-demand imbalance.

Freight rates, which surged earlier due to the Red Sea crisis, could spike again if carriers resume shorter transits en masse, before softening once schedules settle back down. And while rate increases and extended lead times could finally see some relief the resulting supply-side glut may create new headaches for the container shipping lines.

Port activity along the Red Sea remains subdued, with volumes reportedly down by around half compared to last year. A reliable and lasting resolution could rejuvenate regional trade flows, benefiting not only global carriers but also Gulf-based shippers and transhipment hubs that have been cut off from direct east-west routes.

For now, the shipping industry remains caught between political theatre and on-the-ground reality. Whether Trump’s announcement marks the dawn of stability or another premature claim depends on actions in the Bab al-Mandab, not words in Washington.

The situation in the Red Sea remains unpredictable and liable to change. If your business relies on consistent global shipping operations, this is the perfect time to review your contingency plans and explore flexible alternatives. EMAIL Andy Smith, Managing Director, to learn how we maintain stability and keep supply chains running smoothly, whatever the challenge.