container lorry queue

Capacity tightens and rates surge as peak season pressure builds

Jun 1, 2026 | , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Asia–Europe and transpacific market conditions have shifted sharply in recent weeks, as strong demand tightens available space and enables carriers to push through higher spot rates and surcharges, even on shipments moving under long-term contracts.

Recent index data shows steady week-on-week gains, but forward indicators suggest a much steeper rise ahead. Pricing for early June shipments is already high and market signals indicate that rates could climb as high as $6,000–$7,000 per 40ft in the coming weeks, particularly as space tightens in the second half of June.

This demand spike is being driven by large-volume shippers accelerating shipments ahead of new bunker adjustment factors (BAFs) due to take effect from 1 July. These revised fuel charges are expected to increase significantly, prompting a surge in June volumes that is now placing further strain on capacity.

At the same time, carriers are increasing peak season surcharges (PSS) and signalling ongoing reviews. Initial increases are already being implemented in early June, with further upward revisions likely through the summer. Importantly, these surcharges are not being capped, creating continued upward pressure.

On the transpacific, the situation is following a similar trajectory. Capacity reductions, most notably the withdrawal of a key Asia–US East Coast service, have tightened supply, while carriers are taking a more aggressive stance on rate increases. Although recent index movements have been moderate, multiple general rate increases (GRIs) have been announced for June, pointing to a much firmer market ahead.

Contract conditions are also shifting. Previously available rate offers are being withdrawn or replaced with higher-priced agreements, and in some cases, revised terms are becoming commercially unviable. Across both major east–west trades, current expectations are that elevated rate levels and constrained space will persist through June and July, with the potential to extend into August.

For shippers, this creates a highly compressed and competitive freight environment. Securing space is becoming increasingly dependent on rate acceptance, and delays in booking or pricing decisions are likely to result in higher costs or missed sailings.

Metro’s Advice

If you have upcoming shipments, early planning and rapid booking decisions are critical.

  • Expect continued upward pressure on both spot and contract rates through June and into July
  • Allow for additional surcharges, particularly PSS and revised fuel costs
  • Plan for reduced flexibility, with limited space availability on key sailings
  • Anticipate further volatility as carriers adjust pricing in line with demand

Metro’s teams are actively monitoring capacity, pricing movements, and carrier strategies to secure the best possible options for our customers.

Contact your Metro account manager today to review your shipping forecast, secure space, and minimise cost exposure in an increasingly constrained market.

This story was first reported in The Loadstar and can be viewed HERE

Maersk at FXT 1440x1080 1

Hormuz Is Pulling the Ocean Peak Forward

May 28, 2026 | , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Container shipping normally follows a traditional demand curve, with rates climbing into Chinese New Year, softening through spring, and then building towards a Q3 peak. But not this year.

The crisis around the Strait of Hormuz is introducing an extra layer of cost and volatility, which means that instead of a gentle spring lull, the market is moving into peak‑like conditions earlier, and from a higher baseline.

Analysis of more than a decade of data shows how sharply 2026 has diverged from normal patterns on key trade lanes.

Shanghai–Los Angeles rates typically peak three weeks before Chinese New Year as shippers rush orders out, then fall into a sustained post‑holiday slump. This year, the usual pre‑CNY dip was deeper than normal and was followed by an unusually sharp post‑holiday drop. Instead of then drifting sideways, spot rates turned and climbed steeply, with east and west coast transpacific spot rates well above where they would usually sit at this point in the cycle.

On Asia–North Europe, the deviation from normal seasonality emerged slightly earlier, with a two‑week offset, and post‑CNY declines less severe than on the transpacific. The premium over “normal” seasonal levels initially surged, then faded, only to re‑emerge as rates climbed again and remain elevated. The Mediterranean trade has swung even more sharply, with early premiums peaking, dropping back to zero and then returning close to the highest levels.

Analysts are cautious about attributing every dollar of these increases to Hormuz, acknowledging that localised supply‑and‑demand factors also play a role. But the break from normal seasonality coincides closely with the crisis, and there is now a clear correlation between Gulf risk and an extra layer of cost in spot pricing.

Early peak, fuel pressure and front‑loading

Since carriers began diverting away from the Red Sea, importers have tended to order earlier to make sure boxes arrive before China’s Golden Week at the start of October. With longer transit times, containers loaded after mid‑October may not reach destination in time for the main holiday season, so some of the traditional late‑Q3 peak has already been brought forward into late Q2 and early Q3 in recent years.

In 2024, Asia–Europe rates started climbing in early May and peaked by mid‑July. In 2025, after seeing that the previous year’s May start was probably earlier than necessary, prices picked up in early June and again peaked in mid‑July. This year, some carriers are already reporting an uptick in demand on Asia–North Europe and Asia–Med, with daily prices already reacting to mid‑May general rate increase attempts and further rate hikes announced for June.

On top of that, bunker costs jumped after the latest Middle East escalation at the end of February. Emergency fuel surcharges quickly appeared on spot shipments, but contract cargo is tied to quarterly bunker adjustment factors. That has created a powerful timing incentive, with exceptionally strong shipper demand through late May and into June from larger cargo owners looking to move as much as possible before 1 July, when the next quarterly BAF reset will automatically push up contract freight rates.

Capacity constraints and blankings

Higher oil prices and longer routes via the Cape or alternative legs around the region have increased bunker and operating costs and tied up a large slice of global container capacity in longer voyage cycles.

At the same time, the supply side is tight. Few new ships are being delivered directly into the main Asia–Europe and transpacific loops in the near term, keeping the market “short of ships” and charter rates firm. Alliance partners are also using blanked sailings more actively. Instead of restricting blankings to Chinese New Year and Golden Week, carriers are using blankings as a flexible tool to match capacity to demand and support higher rate levels.

New alliance structures and more tactical service adjustments allow carriers to shift capacity more quickly between trades. For shippers, that can translate into sudden changes in available space and short‑notice rate moves, even outside the traditional peak window.

What this means for the 2026 ocean peak

Taken together, these factors are pulling peak‑season conditions forward and widening the window of risk:

  • Rates on key east–west trades are already running several hundred dollars per 40ft above where they would normally be for this stage in the year, even before the usual late‑Q3 build‑up.
  • Bookings and volumes on Asia–Europe trades are strengthening earlier, as shippers bring orders forward to secure space, get ahead of bunker‑linked increases on 1 July and hedge against further Gulf‑related shocks.
  • With limited new capacity entering the market, more dynamic blanking strategies and ongoing uncertainty around Hormuz and the wider Middle East, the system has less slack to absorb sudden volume surges later in the year.

For UK importers, the practical message is that the “traditional” Q3 ocean peak is being replaced by a longer, more uncertain high‑risk period, starting in late spring and running through to the autumn. 

Some of the early‑season rate increases may not fully stick, but geopolitical risk and fuel cost pressure are now baked into the market rather than being a passing anomaly. 

Through proactive capacity planning and contingency-focused supply chain support, Metro helps customers respond effectively to disruption, changing demand patterns and peak season uncertainty. EMAIL Managing Director, Andrew Smith, to learn more.

NYC 1440x1080 1

U.S. Supply Chains Grapple Cost Pressures and Uncertainty

May 28, 2026 | , , , , , , , , ,

Heading into the second half of 2026 shippers face, a politically charged USMCA review, an early tightening on the trans‑Pacific, and war‑driven fuel costs pushing up inland transport prices across North America. 

Together, they are rewriting the assumptions many companies use for peak‑season planning, pricing and inland network design.

USMCA stability at stake for North American production

The United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) reaches its first scheduled “joint review” on 1 July 2026, six years after it took effect. The three governments must decide whether to confirm the deal through 2042, seek adjustments, or signal opposition that could trigger renegotiation and, in the worst case, open the door to an eventual sunset in 2036 if no resolution is found.

Manufacturing across North America, and especially in the automotive sector, has a lot riding on the outcome. Automotive trade accounts for roughly 20–25% of total USMCA trade flows, making it the single largest sectorial user of the agreement. Since 2020, higher regional content requirements and labour‑value rules have already reshaped sourcing patterns for OEMs and tier suppliers, driving more production and component sourcing into Mexico, the U.S. and Canada.

Industry groups on all sides of the border are pushing for a stable, growth‑oriented review that preserves tariff‑free access and gives long‑term visibility to investors. At the same time, policymakers are signalling that the review will not be a formality. Areas likely to come under scrutiny include automotive rules of origin and tracing, enforcement of labour and environmental commitments, energy and state‑owned enterprise disputes, digital trade and data rules, and the role of Chinese investment and components in North American supply chains.

For U.S. manufacturers and importers, this means the next 12–18 months are a critical window to:

  • Verify that products truly qualify under current USMCA rules and identify any borderline cases.
  • Model how tighter regional content or new tracing requirements could change compliance status and cost.
  • Stress‑test footprint and sourcing decisions, particularly where there is high China content flowing via Mexico or Canada into the U.S.

Trans‑Pacific signs of an early peak

Eastbound trans‑Pacific trades are already showing signs of an early peak‑season, with container spot rates from Asia to the U.S. west and east coasts climbing sharply on the back of May general rate increases, as carriers tighten capacity and push through surcharges.

Recent data shows:

  • Spot rates from major South China ports to the U.S. west coast rising almost 100% on levels from only weeks earlier.
  • Asia–U.S. east coast spot rates climbing by 50–60% over a similar period, with some indices even higher.
  • Carriers rolling out peak season surcharges and emergency fuel surcharges ahead of the usual schedule, with higher amounts signalled for late June and 1 July.

Several dynamics are driving this early tightening:

  • Importers are front‑loading orders to get ahead of further cost increases later in the year, including potential tariff changes and bunker‑linked adjustments.
  • Vessel diversions around southern Africa to avoid Red Sea and Gulf of Aden risks, coupled with congestion at some Asian load ports, are absorbing capacity and disrupting schedules.
  • Capacity additions have lagged demand on key lanes, and carriers are using blank sailings and service adjustments to keep utilisation high.

We expect some rate relief later in the summer if additional capacity returns and front‑loaded volumes drop off, but the near‑term picture is one of elevated spot rates and tight space as peak‑season volumes converge with constrained supply.

Trucking and inland costs rise on fuel‑driven inflation

War‑driven fuel prices are pushing trucking and intermodal costs sharply higher, even before demand has fully recovered.

Since the escalation of conflict involving Iran, U.S. retail diesel prices have moved from just under USD 4 per gallon to around USD 5.60 per gallon on average, with some regions significantly higher. This jump has fed directly into trucking Producer Price Index (PPI) measures:

  • Truckload and LTL PPIs have risen markedly in recent months, reversing a multi‑year period of freight deflation;
  • Spot truckload rates on long‑haul lanes have climbed to their highest levels since 2022, with average per‑mile prices up more than 25% year‑on‑year in some benchmarks;
  • Higher fuel and capacity discipline are also starting to pull contract rates up, with increases spreading from truckload into LTL and intermodal.

It is worth noting that these increases are being driven largely by supply‑side constraints, reduced capacity, higher fuel costs and more disciplined carrier pricing, rather than by booming freight demand. For shippers, that means transport inflation can persist even if volumes remain only modestly above 2025 levels.

Metro’s CEO Grant Liddell and Managing Director Andrew Smith will be visiting U.S. offices and customers next week, to review operations and discuss these challenges on the ground, to help shape next‑step plans.

If you’d like to sense‑check your outlook for the second half of 2026 – from USMCA exposure and sourcing footprints to peak‑season capacity and inland cost pressures you can EMAIL Andrew directly or connect with the Metro Global USA team.

China flag and ship

China’s New 2026 Supply Chain Laws: What You Need to Know

May 27, 2026 | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

China is rewiring the legal framework around its ports and supply chains and that matters for every UK shipper moving goods to, from or via China. 

Two new sets of rules in 2026 change who controls disputes, how far you can probe your supply chain, and how China may respond to Western sanctions and due‑diligence demands.

Below we set out what’s changing and what Metro’s customers should be thinking about.

New maritime law puts China’s courts in the driving seat

From 1 May 2026, China’s revised Maritime Code gives Chinese law a much stronger role in contracts of carriage linked to Chinese ports. Where the port of loading or discharge is in China, Chinese courts can apply Chapter IV of the Code to carriage contracts even if the bill of lading or sea freight agreement points to English law.

Law firm HFW has called this a “substantive change”, noting that “chapter four of the Chinese Maritime Code will apply to a contract of carriage regardless of whether or not another law has been incorporated or chosen by the parties”. In effect, if governing‑law and jurisdiction clauses are unclear, Chinese courts now have more room to assert jurisdiction over disputes involving cargo moving through their ports.

Trading agreements often choose English law and London arbitration, while the carrier’s bill of lading may point a different way. The question is whether, in a dispute, a Chinese court will treat the bill of lading as the main contract and apply Chinese law, despite what the trade agreement says.

Some industry experts see this as part of a broader strategic move, to encourage a switch from FOB to CIF terms so that Chinese exporters control freight, insurance and crucially litigation on home turf.

However, any FOB to CIF shift is commercial, not legal, and Incoterms are an international standard which means that FOB remains fully available for China–UK trade, where the buyer wants to control the main–carriage contract and freight costs.

So, China’s legal changes don’t cancel FOB, and UK buyers can still insist on FOB terms and book their own freight, provided the contracts and practical behaviour match that intention.

Supply chain security rules: due diligence under pressure

Alongside the maritime reforms, China has introduced its first comprehensive Regulations on Industrial and Supply Chain Security, effective 31 March 2026. These rules treat supply chains as part of national security rather than a purely commercial matter, bringing them under the oversight of economic, security and cyber authorities.

The most sensitive provision for Western companies is Article 13, which restricts “information gathering activities” related to industrial and supply chains where these are found to breach Chinese law. The language is broad and undefined, creating uncertainty about whether standard due‑diligence activities, which can include supplier questionnaires, ESG audits, human‑rights assessments or on‑site inspections, could fall within the scope.

This sits uneasily alongside emerging Western rules such as the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive and US forced‑labour legislation, which expect companies to map supply chains and scrutinise suppliers in detail. Legal commentators warn that “the new law creates a direct and unresolved conflict between Chinese law and Western due diligence obligations”, with companies potentially facing legal risk in China for work they are required to do under EU or US law.

The regulations also give authorities wide powers to respond to perceived threats to supply‑chain stability. Investigations can target foreign organisations and individuals where there is a “risk or threat” of harm, not just proven damage, and can lead to restrictions on trade, investment and cooperation in China, along with travel or work limits for individuals.

Counter‑measures against foreign sanctions

A companion set of rules – the Regulations on Countering Foreign Improper/Unjustifiable Extraterritorial Jurisdiction, in force from early April – strengthens China’s ability to push back against foreign sanctions, export controls and data‑disclosure demands applied extraterritorially.

These sit alongside the Anti‑Foreign Sanctions Law, blocking rules and the “unreliable entities” regime, creating what one firm describes as an “integrated counter‑sanctions system”. Authorities can investigate and penalise organisations and individuals who implement or even “promote” foreign measures seen as discriminatory towards China, with tools ranging from import and export restrictions to asset seizures and visa bans.

This framework has emerged against a backdrop of heightened geopolitical tension, including Western tariffs and probes into China’s exports, secondary‑sanctions risks around Iran and disputes over strategic assets like the Panama Canal.

What shippers should do

None of this means that trading with China will suddenly stop or that every UK shipper is about to be investigated. But the risk environment has clearly changed, and it is worth taking some practical steps:

  • Check bills of lading, trade agreements and framework contracts to see where Chinese ports are involved, what law and jurisdiction are specified.
    Strengthen English‑law and arbitration provisions and clarify that higher‑tier agreements take precedence.
  • Talk to your insurers about how the revised Maritime Code might affect liability, claims handling and cover for China‑linked moves.
    Consider obtaining Chinese‑law input on key routes or contracts where your exposure is greatest.
  • Map which parts of your ESG and human‑rights due diligence involve Chinese suppliers or sites.
  • For higher‑risk work, such as auditing sensitive regions or investigations linked to sanctions, seek specialist advice on how to stay compliant with both Western obligations and Chinese restrictions.
  • Be mindful of public statements about “decoupling from China” or “boycotting” particular regions. These may be read as aligning with foreign measures and may increase regulatory attention in China.
  • Align messaging between compliance, procurement and communications so that necessary changes to your supply chain are framed around resilience, quality and legal compliance, not politics.

For Metro’s customers, the key takeaway is that China is now using law as an active tool of supply‑chain strategy. Understanding how these new rules work, and adjusting contracts, due‑diligence programmes and communication strategies accordingly, will help keep goods moving while managing a more complex risk landscape.

If you have questions or concerns about any of the developments outlined here EMAIL our Managing Director, Andrew Smith.

Category: Automotive

4PL | Automotive | Chemical | China | eCommerce | Foodstuffs | Hong Kong | International Trade | News | Project | Publishing | Retail | Sea

Latest News in this category