cargo aircraft

IATA’s new air waybill rules shifts risk where it doesn’t belong

On 1 July, the revised International Air Transport Association (IATA) Direct Air Waybill (DAWB) framework came into force, fundamentally changing the contractual relationship between airlines and freight forwarders. 

IATA's revised DAWB framework has prompted an unusually strong reaction from freight forwarding associations around the world. Their concern is that the new contractual arrangements could transfer legal responsibility for certain shipper failures onto freight forwarders, increasing liability, insurance costs and commercial risk across parts of the air cargo supply chain.

While the changes relate specifically to Direct Air Waybills rather than every airfreight shipment, they raise important questions about where responsibility should sit when something goes wrong.

A fundamental change in liability

Under the revised framework, airlines may now regard the freight forwarder as the primary contracting party rather than simply acting as the shipper's agent.

In practical terms, that means airlines could seek indemnification directly from the forwarder if cargo has been mis-declared, contains concealed dangerous goods or fails to meet packaging requirements, even where those failures originated with the shipper.

The change is particularly significant as air cargo continues to experience strong growth in high-value eCommerce shipments, many of which contain products such as lithium batteries that require strict compliance with dangerous goods regulations.

The concern for freight forwarders is straightforward. They rarely manufacture, pack or load the cargo they move. Yet under the revised framework they may now inherit liabilities arising from decisions made long before the shipment reaches their warehouse.

Why the industry is concerned

Industry associations have reacted strongly.

FIATA has argued that freight forwarders should not be expected to assume contractual obligations for cargo they neither own nor physically control. It has also criticised the speed of implementation, saying the agreed consultation and review process had not been completed before the rules came into force.

The US Airforwarders Association has echoed those concerns, warning members that the changes could expose them to liabilities traditionally carried by the shipper, including packaging failures, concealed dangerous goods and inaccurate cargo declarations.

Adding further uncertainty are reports that not every airline intends to implement the framework in exactly the same way. Instead of one globally consistent process, forwarders may now need to establish different contractual arrangements with individual carriers, creating additional administrative complexity across international air freight networks.

Insurance may no longer fit the risk

Perhaps the greatest concern is insurance.

Traditional freight forwarder liability policies have historically been designed to cover professional negligence, errors and omissions in arranging transport.

They were never intended to provide blanket protection against liabilities created by a shipper's actions.

Insurance specialists have warned that many existing policies may not automatically respond if forwarders are treated as the contractual shipper under the revised DAWB framework. That creates the possibility of coverage gaps, higher premiums and tighter underwriting requirements as insurers reassess the level of exposure.

If logistics providers face greater legal exposure, additional insurance costs and more complex contractual obligations, those costs are likely to flow through the supply chain.

Forwarders will also be expected to carry out more rigorous due diligence before accepting cargo. For shippers, that could mean additional checks, more detailed documentation requirements and longer acceptance processes, particularly for higher-risk commodities.

In reality, the revised framework has the potential to increase costs and administrative burden for everyone involved in the movement of air freight.

Metro can guide you through the changes

Regulatory change should never become an unnecessary commercial risk. Metro's air freight specialists work closely with customers to ensure documentation, dangerous goods compliance, cargo acceptance procedures and insurance considerations are properly managed before shipments enter the airline network.

If you would like to understand how the new DAWB framework could affect your business, EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director to keep your cargo moving with confidence.

graph rising

Early peak season continues to support higher ocean rates

Peak season arrived earlier than expected this year, but it shows little sign of easing. Ocean freight rates from Asia to Europe continue to climb as strong demand, disciplined capacity management and lingering geopolitical uncertainty combine to keep pressure on both pricing and vessel space.

The latest round of carrier price increases introduced at the start of July has pushed freight rates higher once again across the Asia-Europe trade. Spot rates have risen by around 7% into North Europe and approximately 10% into the Mediterranean over the past week, extending a market that has steadily strengthened. 

Carriers have maintained tight capacity discipline despite stronger demand, with only a handful of blank sailings currently scheduled, suggesting carriers are successfully filling available vessel space rather than artificially restricting capacity. At the same time, higher freight costs linked to ongoing geopolitical disruption continue to support firmer market conditions. 

Middle East uncertainty continues

Although commercial shipping has resumed through the Strait of Hormuz following the recent ceasefire agreement, the market remains cautious.

Security concerns persist across the wider region and operators continue to factor geopolitical risk into network planning and pricing. Cargo flows are gradually normalising, but the disruption has altered routing decisions and placed additional demand on Mediterranean services, where pricing has risen significantly faster than into Northern Europe. 

Historically, Mediterranean services have commanded a modest premium over North Europe due to vessel deployment patterns. Today, however, that pricing gap has widened to levels rarely seen outside the exceptional supply chain disruption experienced during 2022, reflecting the continuing impact of Middle East instability on European trade lanes. 

The market may be approaching its peak

Demand remains healthy rather than accelerating, vessel space is becoming easier to secure on some services and several carriers have started extending rate validity beyond weekly announcements, suggesting they are becoming more confident about short-term pricing. 

However, this should not be mistaken for a return to normal market conditions.

Large volumes of cargo delayed during June still need to move through the network, while carriers continue to manage allocations carefully. Even if freight rates begin to soften later in the summer, they are expected to remain well above the levels seen earlier this year. 

Carrier confidence remains high

Confidence among ocean carriers is also evident in the charter market.

Improving freight earnings have encouraged more shipping lines to secure additional vessel capacity well into 2027 through longer-term charter agreements rather than relying solely on new-build programmes. Demand for available vessels remains strong across several ship sizes, while rising charter values and vessel prices underline continued 

confidence that freight markets will remain relatively firm for some time. 

For shippers, the message remains unchanged. The current market is being driven by resilient demand, disciplined carrier capacity management and ongoing geopolitical uncertainty rather than short-term disruption alone. Businesses leaving bookings until the last minute are likely to face reduced flexibility, higher costs and fewer routing options.

Plan ahead with Metro

Securing capacity early has become just as important as negotiating freight rates. Metro's ocean freight specialists continuously monitor carrier capacity, market conditions and routing options to help customers minimise disruption and manage transport costs in a fast-changing market.

To discuss your Asia-Europe shipping requirements and build greater resilience into your supply chain, EMAIL our managing director Andrew Smith.

India flag on container doors 1440x1080 1

India, the hottest shipping lane

Ocean freight from India has entered a period of intense demand, with tightening vessel space, rising freight rates and increasing competition for capacity across both European and North American trade lanes.

For businesses diversifying manufacturing away from China or expanding sourcing across South Asia, the challenge is no longer finding suppliers. It is securing reliable shipping capacity in an increasingly constrained market.

Capacity constraints are driving the market

The India-Europe trade has tightened significantly over recent weeks as booming export demand collides with reduced vessel availability.

While demand has recovered strongly, carriers have removed a substantial amount of capacity through blank sailings, cancelled departures, port omissions and revised service schedules. Between March and early July, more than one in five scheduled sailings between India and Europe failed to operate, reducing overall capacity by around 17% across the trade.

The result has been widespread vessel overbooking, booking windows stretching to four to six weeks, and an increasing risk of cargo either being rolled or, in some cases, having confirmed bookings cancelled and rebooked onto later sailings.

Freight rates have responded accordingly. Average pricing from western Indian gateways into Northern Europe has increased by up to 50% in little more than a month, with further peak season surcharges already announced for the second half of July.

Rather than being driven by a single disruption, the current market reflects a genuine supply and demand imbalance, with available vessel space struggling to keep pace with export demand.

Service reliability is becoming just as important as capacity

The tightening market is being compounded by inconsistent service performance.

Several India-Europe services have experienced repeated blank sailings over recent months, while others have omitted key North European ports, further reducing effective capacity available to shippers. On some loops, weekly departures have become considerably less frequent, extending delays whenever cargo is rolled to a subsequent sailing.

At the same time, schedule reliability varies significantly between carrier networks. While some services continue to operate with consistently high reliability through the deployment of additional vessels, others continue to experience frequent disruption and irregular departures.

For shippers, choosing the right carrier and service has become just as important as securing vessel space itself.

Pressure is spreading across South Asia

Across the wider South Asia region, carriers have introduced substantially higher Freight All Kinds (FAK) levels into both North Europe and Mediterranean markets. These increases represent step changes of around 30-50% compared with pricing seen at the end of the first quarter.

These adjustments reflect a broader reset in carrier expectations. With capacity constrained and demand holding firm, pricing is being recalibrated to reflect both operational pressures and ongoing network disruption.

While some variation remains across individual trade lanes, the direction of travel is consistent: a more expensive and less flexible South Asia-Europe market through the current peak season.

US demand is adding further pressure

Demand on the India-US East Coast lane has surged in recent weeks, with booking volumes more than doubling normal levels and freight rates increasing by more than 80% over a four-week period.

In response, one major carrier is preparing to reinstate a previously withdrawn India-US 

East Coast service only weeks after suspending it, underlining how quickly supply and demand dynamics have changed.

This matters for European shippers because carriers continue to allocate vessels where returns are strongest. Strong demand across North American services inevitably competes with India-Europe for finite vessel capacity, making space increasingly valuable across both trades.

Local expertise makes the difference

With an expanding office network across India, Metro’s local teams coordinate factory collections, inland movements, port operations and ocean bookings as a single integrated flow, providing customers with earlier visibility of capacity constraints and greater flexibility when market conditions change.

Whether that means using alternative gateways, splitting shipments across multiple sailings or combining ocean freight with targeted air solutions for time-critical cargo, we help businesses maintain continuity while controlling transport costs.

To discuss your India-Europe or India-North America shipping requirements, EMAIL Metro’s Managing Director.

NYC 1440x1080 1

July deadline for eFiling US product compliance

From 8 July, regulated consumer products entering the US must be supported by electronic compliance certificates filed at the time of customs entry, turning missing or inaccurate information into a direct threat to supply chain continuity.

This is not a change to the underlying safety rules, but to how they are enforced in practice. Paper or PDF certificates kept “on file” will no longer be enough; instead, compliance data must travel with the goods through US Customs and Border Protection’s Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), creating a new operational dependency on clean master data and structured product records.

What is changing in July

The US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is rolling out mandatory electronic filing of Certificates of Compliance for regulated consumer products from 8 July, covering finished goods already in scope of existing CPSC requirements.

Importers (or their customs brokers) must now submit defined certificate data elements electronically via ACE with every applicable customs entry, including low-value and de minimis consignments. Shipments into US Foreign Trade Zones benefit from a longer transition, with mandatory eFiling pushed back to January 2027, but they will ultimately be brought into the same regime.

The new rules will be felt most acutely in sectors with broad product ranges, frequent line changes and complex safety obligations.

Fashion, retail, toys, consumer electronics, nursery products, homeware and household goods are all directly affected, particularly where products require either a Children’s Product Certificate (CPC) or a General Certificate of Conformity (GCC). 

For brands with high-volume direct-to-consumer flows and seasonal collections, the inclusion of de minimis parcels means that even small data gaps can disrupt launches and delay customer deliveries.

From paper certificates to digital compliance

For each shipment, importers must transmit a structured set of data points, including product identifiers (such as SKUs), details of the certifying party, the specific safety rules applied, manufacturing dates and locations, test dates and locations, and contact details for the laboratory and record keeper. 

Importers can choose between two methods of submitting compliance data:

1. Full PGA Message Set

Under this option, all certificate data is filed directly into ACE for every shipment. Required information includes:

  • Product identifiers such as SKU or GTIN
  • Applicable CPSC safety standards
  • Manufacturing dates and locations
  • Manufacturer or assembler details
  • Testing dates and testing facility information
  • Laboratory details
  • Contact details for the party maintaining compliance records

This approach is generally more suitable for importers handling smaller product ranges or irregular shipments.

2. Reference PGA Message Set

For businesses importing the same regulated products regularly, the CPSC Product Registry offers a more streamlined alternative.

Product certificate information can be pre-registered in advance, allowing customs brokers to submit only:

  • Certifier ID
  • Product ID
  • Certificate Version ID

This method can significantly reduce repetitive data entry and support faster customs processing.

Both approaches rely on accurate, pre-prepared data that aligns exactly with the physical shipment.

New operational and data challenges

Importers now need to manage the intersection of multiple requirements at SKU level, for example combining US flammability rules for clothing, chemical restrictions on substances such as lead and phthalates, and labelling standards for fibre content, care instructions and safety warnings.

For fashion and lifestyle brands, that means building robust testing programmes, maintaining complete technical files and ensuring master data can be translated into CPSC-compliant certificate records without manual rework at the point of entry.

Regulators have signalled that they expect full compliance from the implementation date, with no broad indication of delayed enforcement.

Incorrect or incomplete eFilings can trigger automated customs holds, manual inspections, potential seizure or refusal of non-compliant shipments, and even civil penalties where systemic failures are identified. For time-sensitive sectors such as fashion and retail, where margins and calendars are already under pressure, even short delays at the border can undermine entire seasons or promotional campaigns.

Why exporters and origin teams matter

Although legal responsibility for eFiling sits with the US importer, a significant proportion of the required information resides with exporters, manufacturers and upstream partners.

Testing records, manufacturing details, lab certifications and product specifications are typically held at origin, and without structured access to this data, importers may struggle to complete mandatory filings accurately and on time. Exporters targeting the US market therefore need to map CPSC scope with their customers and embed electronic information sharing into standard shipping processes so certificate data is available well before cargo departs.

Turning compliance into an advantage

Businesses that invest early in mapping their CPSC exposure, closing testing gaps, building digital certificate libraries and rehearsing eFilings in test environments will move through the new regime with fewer delays and lower risk. 

Those that treat compliance as a last-minute paperwork exercise risk finding that missing or inconsistent data becomes a bigger threat than tariffs, capacity constraints or transport disruption.

Metro is already working with customers in fashion, retail, consumer goods and wider international trade to align product data, testing records, documentation and customs processes across origin and destination teams. 

If you import into the United States and want to turn the new CPSC eFiling rules into a competitive advantage rather than a source of disruption, EMAIL our Managing Director, Andrew Smith, directly.