Suez MSC vessel

Red Sea return gathers pace, but risks remain

Aug 19, 2026 | , , ,

Container shipping through the Red Sea and Suez Canal is gradually increasing as major carriers test a return to the shorter Asia–Europe route, potentially signalling an important change for global supply chains.

But this is far from a return to normal. Recent deadly attacks demonstrate that security conditions remain volatile, while carriers are assessing individual sailings carefully and retaining the option to divert around the Cape of Good Hope at short notice.

For shippers, the potential benefits of shorter transit times must therefore be weighed against continuing routing uncertainty, war-risk insurance costs and the possibility that a broader return to Suez could create new congestion elsewhere in the network.

Carriers cautiously increase Suez transits

Maersk currently has four services passing through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait in both directions each week, equivalent to around one-third of its normal service pattern. The carrier believes current intelligence and security assessments support a gradual return, although every sailing remains subject to an individual risk assessment.

Hapag-Lloyd is taking a similarly cautious approach and expects any increase in Suez services to happen progressively rather than through an immediate network-wide switch.

Other carriers are also adding capacity. Cosco has reopened bookings for Red Sea services and is preparing a Far East–Red Sea rotation through Bab el-Mandeb, while CMA CGM already operates several services using Suez. The Gemini network has also moved additional Asia–Mediterranean services back towards the Red Sea.

The operational attraction is significant. Restoring the Suez route reduces the additional sailing distance created by Cape diversions and could ultimately release vessel and container capacity into a market already experiencing equipment and space constraints.

That is particularly relevant following severe weather disruption in China. Typhoon Dolphin closed operations at Ningbo and Shanghai during 7–8 August, leaving more than 2.4 million TEU of capacity across networks affected by the shutdown and subsequent congestion. With backlogs potentially taking weeks to clear, shorter vessel rotations could help carriers make more effective use of constrained fleets and equipment.

However, recent traffic data highlights how quickly sentiment can change. Total Red Sea/Suez transits fell from 255 vessels to 222 in a week, as operators adopted a more cautious approach following the renewed Houthi attacks.

Security risk translates directly into costs

The biggest obstacle to a sustained return remains security. A deadly attack on a commercial vessel off Yemen in August reinforced the wider and continuing threat to shipping, while missile and drone attacks have maintained uncertainty around the Bab el-Mandeb corridor.

Carriers are consequently treating Red Sea routings as conditional rather than permanent. A deterioration in security could prompt individual sailings, entire services or wider networks to return to the Cape route with relatively little notice.

For cargo owners, that uncertainty has an important financial dimension. Standard marine cargo policies typically exclude war risks, meaning shipments entering designated high-risk areas may require specific endorsements. Current market indications suggest Red Sea war-risk cover can cost approximately 0.5% to more than 1% of insured cargo value per voyage. Carriers may also pass additional security and operating expenses to customers through specialised risk surcharges.

Insurance availability itself can vary according to the cargo, vessel and parties involved. Some underwriters may restrict or refuse particular risks, while routing changes need to be declared correctly to avoid potential coverage issues.

Shippers should therefore consider the total cost and risk of the routing, rather than assuming that a shorter Suez transit automatically produces a cheaper supply chain.

A return could create another wave of disruption

There is another complication. A large-scale return to Suez could initially increase congestion rather than improve schedule reliability.

Cape diversions have fundamentally altered vessel arrival patterns. Switching significant numbers of ships back to the shorter route would change those patterns again, potentially creating bunching as vessels reach European terminals earlier and in different sequences.

That is particularly important while European ports are already managing congestion and inland transport constraints that are heightened by limited barge availability. Carriers are therefore planning phased returns partly to avoid overwhelming terminals.

For shippers, the next phase of the Red Sea situation could consequently bring both opportunity and uncertainty. Shorter routings may improve transit times and eventually release capacity, but security assessments, insurance premiums, surcharges and rapidly changing schedules will remain important considerations.

Metro monitors carrier routings, security developments, insurance implications and schedule changes across the Red Sea, Suez and Cape alternatives, helping customers understand the true cost and operational impact of each option. With conditions capable of changing from one sailing to the next, talk to Metro before booking critical cargo so we can assess the routing, timing, cost and risk that best protect your supply chain.

To learn more, EMAIL Managing Director Andrew Smith today.

Hormuz satellite

Middle East conflict is reshaping global shipping once again

Jul 22, 2026 | , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and Red Sea is facing renewed disruption with 14 Iranian attacks on vessels since June 25th, the breakdown of the US-Iran ceasefire and a Houthi threat to target Saudi-linked shipping in the Bab al-Mandab.

The tanker Kavomaleas, initially reported on fire in the Strait of Hormuz, has since been confirmed as the target of an attack on Monday. Its crew abandoned the vessel, which remained adrift and on fire. UK Maritime Trade Operations also reported that another tanker in the Strait’s southern transit corridor had been attacked and set alight, with its crew also abandoning ship.

These incidents have further weakened confidence in the safety of the Strait, which has historically carried around one fifth of the world’s crude oil and liquefied natural gas.

Traffic has fallen sharply during the latest period of escalation, with only six vessels crossing the Strait in a day, the lowest level in five weeks, while hundreds remained at anchor outside the waterway.

For shippers, the concern extends well beyond regional security. Rising fuel costs, higher insurance premiums, longer voyage times and reduced network capacity all have the potential to increase transport costs and reduce schedule reliability across global supply chains.

Hormuz remains the world's most important energy chokepoint

The attacks on Kavomaleas and a second tanker follows earlier incidents in July involving three vessels, including a Qatari-flagged LNG carrier.

Iran subsequently accused vessels of transiting without its permission, using its interpretation of the MoU agreement to assert control over passage through the Strait.

While the United States insists the waterway remains open to commercial traffic and has deployed a naval blockade, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) threat to execute attacks on unauthorised vessels cannot be ignored.

The impact extends far beyond the Gulf itself. Because such a significant proportion of the world's crude oil and LNG exports move through Hormuz, even relatively limited disruption can trigger sharp movements in energy markets as traders price in the risk of prolonged restrictions.

Brent crude briefly climbed above US$90 per barrel following the latest escalation, increasing expectations of higher bunker costs and transport surcharges across both ocean and air freight markets.

Red Sea uncertainty threatens container shipping

While Hormuz is primarily an energy concern, the Red Sea remains critical to global container shipping.

Recent threats to Saudi-linked shipping in the Bab al-Mandab Strait have renewed concerns that carriers may once again reduce Red Sea transits or suspend recently restored Suez services.

Maersk recently returned its Gemini AE15 service to the Suez route and planned to add Jeddah from August. Its MECL service also calls at the port.

CMA CGM operates several Asia-Europe services through Suez. Recent schedules show some Jeddah calls omitted on the MEX and BEX2 services, although not all calls have been removed.

Should security risks increase again, those services could once more be rerouted around southern Africa.

Such diversions add thousands of nautical miles to Asia-Europe voyages, increasing fuel consumption, extending transit times and reducing the effective capacity of the global container fleet. Even though no vessels are removed from service, longer round voyages mean fewer sailings can be completed each year, tightening capacity and placing upward pressure on freight rates.

Marine insurance remains available for vessels transiting the Gulf, but at substantially higher prices.

War risk hull premiums reportedly stood at a fraction of 1% of insured vessel value before the crisis began in February. They have since risen to between 3% and 10%.

For a tanker valued at US$100 million, this could increase the premium for a single transit from around US$250,000 to as much as US$10 million.

The Lloyd’s Market Association has stated that the decline in traffic is not primarily the result of insurance being unavailable. It said owners are choosing not to transit because of safety concerns.

These costs ultimately feed through to supply chains via emergency surcharges, bunker adjustment factors and higher freight rates.

Although neither the Strait of Hormuz nor the Red Sea is theoretically closed, commercial conditions remain highly fluid.

Container carriers continue to review sailing schedules, tanker operators are assessing voyage risks on a daily basis and insurance markets remain volatile. Further attacks or additional security measures could quickly alter routing decisions across both regions.

Visibility turns uncertainty into control

Geopolitical events cannot be prevented, but their impact can be managed with real-time visibility and timely data.

Metro combines global freight expertise with advanced digital visibility through our MVT platform, providing customers with real-time shipment tracking down to SKU level across all transport modes. Metro helps businesses identify disruption early, make informed decisions and keep products flowing through increasingly complex global supply chains.

To learn how Metro can strengthen the resilience and visibility of your international supply chain, EMAIL Managing Director Andrew Smith today.

Emirates Dubai

Air freight remains resilient despite Middle East tensions

Jul 5, 2026 | , ,

Global cargo volumes remained strong throughout June, finishing 9% higher than the same month last year and building on steady growth seen throughout the first half of 2026. 

While capacity has gradually returned to the market following the disruption caused by the Iran-US conflict, pricing remains significantly above last year's levels as airlines continue to operate in a more complex and uncertain environment. 

Although the ceasefire had allowed airlines to restore many services across the Gulf, it is proving to be very fragile and the market is far from returning to normal.

The European Union Aviation Safety Agency on 7 July extended guidance advising airlines to avoid Iranian, Iraqi and Lebanese airspace until the end of August following renewed exchanges between the US and Iran. While restrictions affecting several Gulf states have been relaxed, airlines operating between Europe and Asia continue to face longer routings around conflict zones, increasing both flight times and operating costs. 

Many Gulf carriers have rebuilt schedules and returned aircraft to service, helping overall capacity recover. However, operational planning remains heavily influenced by evolving security assessments, insurance requirements and regulatory guidance, meaning disruption can quickly return if regional tensions escalate. 

Capacity is improving but rates remain elevated

Global air freight capacity has increased by around 3% over recent weeks, with Middle East capacity now marginally above the same period last year. Despite this recovery, average freight rates during June remained approximately one-third higher than a year earlier, underlining how the market continues to price in operational risk as well as strong underlying demand. 

Rates into the Middle East remain particularly elevated compared with pre-conflict levels, although they have eased from the exceptional highs seen during the height of the disruption as more capacity returns to affected trade lanes. 

AI is replacing eCommerce as the growth engine

For several years, cross-border eCommerce drove much of the growth in global air cargo. Today, semiconductor manufacturing, AI infrastructure and high-value technology products have become the primary drivers of demand.

Strong exports from Taiwan and South Korea continue to generate significant volumes across global air freight networks, helping offset weaker eCommerce activity following changes to low-value import rules in both the US and Europe. Overall, air cargo demand continues to outperform expectations despite these changing market dynamics. 

New regulations are reshaping eCommerce

The European Union has now removed de minimus duty-free treatment for low-value imports, introducing additional customs charges on individual shipments from outside the bloc. The immediate result has been a sharp reduction in direct freighter capacity between China and Europe as eCommerce operators assess the commercial impact and adapt their distribution strategies.

While experience in the US suggests volumes are likely to recover over time, many businesses are expected to shift towards larger consolidated consignments rather than individual parcel movements, changing the mix of cargo moving through international air freight networks. 

While capacity is gradually returning and some pricing pressures have eased, the combination of geopolitical risk, regulatory change and evolving demand means air freight remains a market where agility and forward planning continue to deliver a competitive advantage.

Metro's air freight specialists monitor market developments daily, helping customers secure reliable capacity, identify the most effective routings and respond quickly as conditions evolve.

To discuss your international air freight requirements and build greater resilience into your supply chain, EMAIL Andrew Smith, Metro’s Managing Director.

container ship and naval escort

Iran/US ceasefires bring relief, but supply chains still face a long road back

Jun 24, 2026 | , , , ,

The latest ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hezbollah, alongside the broader US/Iran framework aimed at ending months of regional conflict, has improved sentiment across energy and freight markets. 

Oil prices have retreated, financial markets have stabilised and hopes are growing that the Strait of Hormuz could gradually reopen to normal commercial traffic. Yet for supply chains, the crisis is entering a recovery phase rather than reaching a conclusion.

While diplomats work to turn temporary agreements into lasting settlements, the operational reality remains far more complicated. Shipping lines, insurers and logistics providers are preparing for a lengthy and uneven normalisation process rather than a swift return to pre-crisis conditions.

Diplomacy has moved faster than logistics

The new ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah removes one of the biggest threats to wider regional stability and supports the broader US-Iran agreement. However, restoring confidence across global transport networks will take far longer than negotiating peace terms.

Although limited vessel movements have resumed, hundreds of ships remain affected by months of disruption and maritime authorities continue to treat the Strait of Hormuz with caution. Mine clearance operations, traffic management measures and elevated insurance requirements mean normal trading conditions remain some way off. Even where vessels are moving, transit remains slower and more tightly controlled than before the conflict.

Gulf supply chains face months of adjustment

Importers and exporters serving the GCC area, including major markets such as Saudi Arabia and the UAE, should not expect an immediate return to normal operations.

Regional carriers, feeder operators and overland transport providers have spent months redesigning networks around restrictions and delays. As cargo begins flowing again, ports and transhipment hubs are likely to experience congestion as stranded containers and equipment gradually work their way through the system.

Schedule reliability will improve, but only progressively. Backlogs accumulated over several months cannot be unwound in a matter of weeks, and businesses serving Gulf markets should continue planning for volatility through the summer.

Energy costs remain a major risk

Even though oil prices have fallen on hopes that hostilities are easing, energy markets remain highly sensitive.

Around one-fifth of global oil supply normally moves through the Strait of Hormuz. Any delays to reopening, security incidents or setbacks in ceasefire negotiations could quickly reverse recent gains.

Bunker fuel prices remain well above pre-crisis levels, while jet fuel and diesel markets continue to reflect constrained supply and cautious inventories. Fuel costs remain one of the largest components of transport pricing, meaning surcharges and cost pressures are unlikely to disappear quickly.

Airlines are closely monitoring fuel costs as they finalise winter schedules. Higher operating costs could place further pressure on passenger capacity, with consequences for belly-hold airfreight space.

Road freight operators face similar concerns. Diesel prices remain vulnerable to energy market swings, while ongoing uncertainty continues to influence transport costs across Europe and Asia.

Meanwhile, supply chains that have adapted to months of disruption are unlikely to reverse course overnight. Alternative routings, additional inventories and diversified sourcing strategies developed during the crisis are likely to remain part of many companies' long-term risk management plans.

Stability may return, but gradually

The ceasefires between Israel and Hezbollah and the wider US-Iran framework represent meaningful progress, despite the postponement of direct talks between the US and Iran. 

However, diplomacy has moved faster than physical supply chains.

Shipping schedules, equipment availability, insurance markets and energy supplies all require time to normalise. The coming months are likely to bring gradual improvement rather than an immediate reset.

Businesses that continue to secure capacity early, maintain inventory visibility and build flexibility into their transport strategies will be best positioned to complete the transition from crisis management to recovery.

Metro's teams are monitoring developments across ocean, air and road markets in real time. As conditions evolve, we help customers stay ahead of disruption, secure capacity and adapt quickly to changing circumstances. 

In volatile markets, resilience comes not from reacting faster than everyone else, but from being prepared before disruption arrives. EMAIL our Managing Director, Andrew Smith to learn more.

Category: Middle East

Middle East | News | Sea | Supply Chain

Latest News in this category