Gulf of Oman 1440x1080 1

Gulf Tensions Redefining Asia–Europe Shipping

May 28, 2026 | , , , , ,

Diplomatic efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz remain stalled, constraining one of the world’s most important energy corridors and prolonging the biggest disruption to global oil supply in decades. 

Public statements from Tehran suggest Hormuz will only fully reopen once the conflict with the US and Israel is resolved, and even then Iran intends to retain a significant degree of control over traffic through the waterway.

Washington, for its part, is using an oil‑export blockade and secondary sanctions to squeeze Iran’s revenues and push it towards a ceasefire and broader deal. That has created a stand‑off, with Iran using threats to shipping and de facto control of Hormuz as leverage, while the US is using control of Iran’s oil exports and financial channels as its own bargaining chip. 

Pakistan has tried to mediate between Washington and Tehran, hosting talks and shuttling ideas between the two sides, but recent rounds have produced little progress. Iran wants an end to the blockade and a clear framework for Hormuz governance before tackling nuclear issues, while the US wants concrete nuclear concessions up front, with maritime and sanctions relief later. That gap, combined with sporadic flare‑ups around the Gulf, is why many analysts now see a prolonged stand‑off or even a return to open conflict as real possibilities.

Oil and fuel markets stay tight

This deadlock is feeding directly into energy markets. Roughly a fifth to a quarter of global seaborne oil normally move through Hormuz, so any sustained disruption has an outsized effect on supply and sentiment. Since the start of the war, benchmark crude prices have jumped by around 50%.

Even partial diversions and intermittent tanker flows are enough to keep physical crude markets tight and refinery margins elevated. Refineries in Europe, the US and West Africa have shifted more output into aviation and marine fuels, but feedstock uncertainty and higher risk premiums are feeding through into bunker and jet prices. For carriers, that means bunker adjustment factors, emergency fuel surcharges and war‑risk charges are now key drivers of end‑user freight rates across ocean and air.

How this feeds into peak season

Higher oil and fuel prices ripple into every mode, and the timing of bunker adjustments now interacts directly with the traditional peak‑season calendar.

Historically, Asia–Europe peak season demand has built from late June through to China’s Golden Week in early October. In the last two years, that pattern was already starting earlier as shippers brought orders forward to deal with Red Sea diversions and longer voyage times. In 2024, Asia–Europe rates began climbing in early May and peaked by mid‑July; in 2025 the climb started in early June, again topping out around mid‑July.

This year, Hormuz‑linked fuel volatility adds another layer. Bunker costs spiked after the latest escalation at the end of February, prompting emergency surcharges on spot cargo and triggering higher quarterly bunker adjustment factors for contracts from 1 July. Many large shippers are now accelerating Asia–Europe shipments through May and June to move as much volume as possible before that quarterly BAF reset takes effect.

The result is a front‑loaded peak, with exceptionally strong demand in late May and June, driven by restocking needs and attempts to get ahead of fuel‑linked rate hikes. That demand sits on top of the disruption “premium” already visible in spot rates on key east–west trades, where prices are running several hundred dollars per 40ft above where seasonal patterns would normally put them.

For UK shippers, the geopolitical headlines around Hormuz translate into three practical realities:

  • Fuel remains a structural driver of freight costs. Even if crude prices ease from day‑to‑day, bunker and jet markets are likely to stay tight and volatile as long as Hormuz is contested.
  • Timing matters more than usual. Quarterly bunker adjustment dates and carriers’ general rate increase cycles are now key milestones; moving cargo just before a BAF reset can materially change landed cost.
  • Peak season is starting earlier and lasting longer. Instead of a neat late‑Q3 surge, shippers face a longer high‑risk period running from late spring into the autumn, with rate spikes tied as much to fuel and conflict as to consumer demand.

Against that backdrop, we recommend that shippers should plan around higher and more volatile transport costs, rather than hoping for a quick return to pre‑crisis norms. Building in more lead time, watching bunker‑linked surcharges closely, and spreading volume across services and carriers can all help reduce the risk of being caught out by the next twist in Hormuz diplomacy.

EMAIL Managing Director, Andrew Smith, today to secure capacity, protect transit times and keep your supply chain moving in a rapidly changing environment.

ships at anchor

Middle East Conflict Is Rewriting the Airfreight Peak

May 28, 2026 | , , , , , ,

Airfreight has always played a dual role in supply chains, providing a reliable core mode for some flows and a pressure‑relief valve when ocean networks clog up. 

The current Middle East crisis has upended that safety‑valve function; because instead of a short, sharp bottleneck, the market has shifted into a higher‑cost, more volatile place, that is already reshaping the 2026 peak season.

The initial fear was that conflict around the Gulf would trigger a sudden collapse in air capacity and an uncontrollable spike in jet fuel costs. That fearful initial phase has now passed, but pricing has not returned to pre‑crisis norms. Freight indices show global air rates holding well above early‑2026 levels, with some Asia–Europe spot rates doubling by April and still sitting nearly 75% above pre-war levels.

Fuel surcharges are no longer climbing week by week, but they remain dramatically higher than at the start of the year. The air cargo market is not spiralling upward, but it has clearly found a new, elevated pricing floor.

Capacity returns, but on new terms

Freighter lift grew around 3% month‑on‑month in April, reversing earlier declines, although week‑on‑week growth has slowed as airlines add capacity cautiously. Gulf carriers have been rebuilding their schedules, with strong month‑on‑month growth on Asia–Middle East and Europe–Middle East lanes, and major integrators have restored intercontinental flights into Bahrain, Dubai and other Gulf hubs from Europe and Asia.

Regional airspace is open again, albeit with corridors, pre‑approvals and routing constraints. Network operators have re‑established connections that link Europe, Asia and Africa through the Middle East, and are gradually extending services deeper into the region. Backup hubs in places such as Riyadh and Muscat remain in use while the security picture stabilises, but some carriers have also found alternative “mid‑points” in India and South‑East Asia to recover Asia–Europe capacity.

Other operators remain more cautious. Some European freighter airlines are still avoiding most Middle East stops, citing airspace and security concerns, and are waiting on further guidance from aviation security authorities before fully reopening networks. Major Asian carriers have delayed the resumption of certain passenger and freighter services into Riyadh and Dubai, even as they add freighter capacity into Bangkok, Vietnam and other South‑East Asian gateways.

Recent rate data shows some easing out of major Asian hubs and on Europe–US and Europe–Gulf routes, but pricing remains historically high. Outbound Heathrow rates, for example, are still more than 40% above last year. Refineries in Europe, the US and West Africa have shifted output towards aviation fuel, airlines have rerouted networks and trimmed weaker services, and capacity is being deployed with unusual discipline. Together, these factors are preventing a rapid collapse in pricing.

What this means for the “traditional” air peak

In a normal year, shippers would expect a relatively quiet summer followed by a steady build‑up into the late‑Q3/Q4 peak. Middle East disruption has scrambled that pattern in three important ways:

  • The market has already experienced “mini peaks” in Q2, as conflict‑related diversions and fuel shocks pushed rates to levels normally associated with peak season.
  • With airspace constraints, elevated fuel costs and tight capacity discipline, the system has less slack than usual. The ability to “pivot to air” from ocean at short notice is weaker.
  • Geopolitical risk now appears to be permanently repriced into airfreight. Even if the Gulf situation stabilises, fuel surcharges and base rates are likely to remain volatile, and the industry is planning around that assumption with more frequent surcharge adjustments.

For UK shippers, the implication is that 2026’s airfreight peak is less about one clear season and more about a longer period of heightened risk, with short, unpredictable demand spikes layered onto an already expensive base. Treating the whole second half of the year as potentially “peak‑like”, budgeting for higher air costs, and pre‑booking critical flows on key lanes will be essential to avoid being caught out.

Metro works closely with airlines and partners to secure capacity, identify alternative routings and maintain reliability in a disrupted market. If your supply chain depends on airfreight, EMAIL our Managing Director, Andrew Smith, to protect space, manage cost exposure and keep your cargo moving.

Suez empty

Suez return remains fragile as carriers weigh faster transit against overcapacity

May 13, 2026 | , , , ,

Although some shipping lines have begun selectively routing vessels back through the Suez Canal to reduce transit times and improve vessel utilisation, the industry remains far from a full-scale return to pre-crisis operating patterns.

Diversions around the Cape of Good Hope (COGH) have absorbed substantial global vessel capacity over the past two years by extending voyage times and reducing effective fleet availability. A broader return to Suez routing would rapidly reverse much of that dynamic, potentially releasing millions of TEU of effective capacity back into the market.

Routing via Suez shortens Asia–Europe voyages by more than 3,000 nautical miles compared with Cape routing, reducing transit times, improving vessel productivity and lowering fuel consumption, but the wider implications could be far more disruptive.

Faster transit times could rapidly shift supply and pricing dynamics

Industry estimates suggest that restoring normal Red Sea routings could release around 7% of effective fleet capacity back into the market. This would arrive at a time when container shipping is already facing heavy new-build vessel deliveries and relatively modest long-term demand growth.

The risk is that markets could move rapidly from relative tightness towards oversupply, placing renewed downward pressure on freight rates across major trades.

CMA CGM has increased the number of Suez Canal transits on two selected services, with shippers paying premium fees in exchange for faster transit times and reduced inventory delays.

Other carriers may be evaluating Red Sea routing strategies, although they remain cautious about large-scale network restructuring while regional security conditions remain unstable.

Importantly, any financial benefit from returning to Suez is still being offset by elevated war-risk insurance premiums and ongoing operational uncertainty linked to Houthi activity and wider instability across the Middle East.

Middle East instability continues to cloud long-term planning

Earlier expectations that container shipping could progressively return to normal Red Sea operations during 2026 have weakened significantly following renewed military escalation involving the US, Iran, Israel and regional proxy groups.

Several shipping lines that had previously explored limited Suez re-entry have since adopted a more cautious position, with some reversing earlier routing plans and returning services to COGH diversions.

At the same time, wider global trade patterns are also evolving in ways that partially offset oversupply concerns.

Chinese exporters are increasingly expanding into alternative markets including South America, Africa, the Indian subcontinent and the Middle East itself. These longer and more operationally complex trade flows consume additional vessel capacity and are helping absorb part of the substantial new tonnage entering the global fleet.

Even so, structural pressure continues to build beneath the surface.

Global trade growth is still expected to remain below the pace of new vessel deliveries scheduled between 2026 and 2028. Larger vessels are expected to feel the effects of oversupply first, particularly as cascading tonnage begins placing pressure on secondary and regional trades.

For shippers, the result is an increasingly uncertain operating environment where transit times, freight rates and network structures could change rapidly depending on how security conditions evolve across the Middle East.

While a full-scale return to Suez routing still appears unlikely in the near term, selective transits and gradual network adjustments are already beginning to reshape carrier strategies, pricing behaviour and capacity planning across major east-west trades.

Metro is working closely with customers to assess Suez and Cape of Good Hope routing trade-offs, comparing carrier strategies and identifying the ocean freight solutions most aligned to their supply chain priorities, inventory requirements and risk tolerance.

EMAIL Metro Managing Director Andrew Smith to learn how differing Suez and Cape routing strategies could affect your supply chain, and how Metro helps shippers balance transit times, security risk, insurance exposure, cost volatility and schedule reliability.

Hormuz satellite

Middle East disruption continues as Metro scales contingency solutions

Apr 29, 2026 | , , , , , , , , ,

The extension of the US–Iran ceasefire has done little to stabilise operating conditions in the region, with last week’s seizure of two MSC-managed container vessels by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in the Strait of Hormuz. 

The incident highlight the ongoing risk to commercial shipping and reinforces the reality that access through Hormuz remains severely constrained, with container flows through the Strait largely suspended.

Land-bridge solutions under pressure as demand surges

As traditional shipping routes have been disrupted, supply chains have shifted rapidly towards alternative solutions, particularly land-bridge routes across the Gulf.

However, these corridors are now under significant strain. Demand for trucking capacity has surged well beyond available supply, with rates on key lanes such as Jeddah to the UAE rising four to five times above pre-conflict levels.

Jeddah has become the primary gateway following security concerns at Khor Fakkan and Salalah, concentrating volumes into a single entry point and creating further bottlenecks. In some cases, demand for road capacity has reached multiples of available supply, driving sharp price escalation and limiting flexibility for shippers.

Operational disruption now outweighs capacity availability

One of the defining characteristics of the current market is that disruption is being driven less by a lack of physical assets and more by how networks are operating.

Ocean carriers are navigating around both the Red Sea and Hormuz, adding 15–20% to voyage distances, increasing fuel consumption and reducing effective capacity. At the same time, global port congestion has exceeded 3 million TEU, further impacting reliability. 

Airfreight networks are also adjusting to restricted airspace and reduced Gulf capacity, while road freight is absorbing increased volumes through regional corridors, adding complexity and extending transit times.

The result is a market where capacity exists, but is harder to access, less predictable and more expensive to deploy.

Pricing volatility accelerates as fuel and disruption outpace contracts

Freight pricing is struggling to keep pace with the speed of change.

Across ocean freight, emergency bunker surcharges are now widely applied, while traditional fuel adjustment mechanisms lag behind real-time cost increases. In airfreight, fuel surcharges are being revised more frequently as jet fuel prices continue to rise. In road freight, fuels costs typically represent over 30% of operator costs, placing short-term pressure on carriers and increasing the likelihood of further cost pass-through. 

The situation is further complicated by simultaneous pressure across multiple global chokepoints.

Disruption linked to the Strait of Hormuz is occurring alongside continued Red Sea instability and wider geopolitical friction across key corridors. This has created a structurally higher-risk operating environment, where any escalation can quickly remove capacity, extend transit times and increase costs across all modes. 

Scaling solutions to maintain cargo flow

In response, Metro has significantly increased its operational focus on the region, with time dedicated to resolving Middle East-linked problems rising by more than 1000%.

The focus is on execution: ensuring cargo continues to move and that shipments already in transit are delivered using the most effective available solution.

Metro is actively supporting customers through:

  • Dynamic re-routing of in-transit cargo, avoiding disruption hotspots
  • Alternative gateway strategies, identifying viable entry points outside high-risk zones
  • Airfreight deployment, where speed and reliability are critical
  • Land-bridge and multimodal solutions, maintaining flow where ocean routes are constrained

This flexible, hands-on approach is essential in a market where conditions are changing rapidly and pre-planned routes are no longer sufficient.

If you have cargo moving to, from or through the Middle East, or shipments currently held en route, Metro can help you identify and implement the most effective resolutions.

EMAIL Managing Director, Andrew Smith, today to secure capacity, protect transit times and keep your supply chain moving in a rapidly changing environment.

Category: Middle East

4PL | Air | Middle East | News | Sea | Supply Chain

Latest News in this category