NYC 1440x1080 1

July deadline for eFiling US product compliance

Jun 24, 2026 | , , , , , , , , , , , ,

From 8 July, regulated consumer products entering the US must be supported by electronic compliance certificates filed at the time of customs entry, turning missing or inaccurate information into a direct threat to supply chain continuity.

This is not a change to the underlying safety rules, but to how they are enforced in practice. Paper or PDF certificates kept “on file” will no longer be enough; instead, compliance data must travel with the goods through US Customs and Border Protection’s Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), creating a new operational dependency on clean master data and structured product records.

What is changing in July

The US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is rolling out mandatory electronic filing of Certificates of Compliance for regulated consumer products from 8 July, covering finished goods already in scope of existing CPSC requirements.

Importers (or their customs brokers) must now submit defined certificate data elements electronically via ACE with every applicable customs entry, including low-value and de minimis consignments. Shipments into US Foreign Trade Zones benefit from a longer transition, with mandatory eFiling pushed back to January 2027, but they will ultimately be brought into the same regime.

The new rules will be felt most acutely in sectors with broad product ranges, frequent line changes and complex safety obligations.

Fashion, retail, toys, consumer electronics, nursery products, homeware and household goods are all directly affected, particularly where products require either a Children’s Product Certificate (CPC) or a General Certificate of Conformity (GCC). 

For brands with high-volume direct-to-consumer flows and seasonal collections, the inclusion of de minimis parcels means that even small data gaps can disrupt launches and delay customer deliveries.

From paper certificates to digital compliance

For each shipment, importers must transmit a structured set of data points, including product identifiers (such as SKUs), details of the certifying party, the specific safety rules applied, manufacturing dates and locations, test dates and locations, and contact details for the laboratory and record keeper. 

Importers can choose between two methods of submitting compliance data:

1. Full PGA Message Set

Under this option, all certificate data is filed directly into ACE for every shipment. Required information includes:

  • Product identifiers such as SKU or GTIN
  • Applicable CPSC safety standards
  • Manufacturing dates and locations
  • Manufacturer or assembler details
  • Testing dates and testing facility information
  • Laboratory details
  • Contact details for the party maintaining compliance records

This approach is generally more suitable for importers handling smaller product ranges or irregular shipments.

2. Reference PGA Message Set

For businesses importing the same regulated products regularly, the CPSC Product Registry offers a more streamlined alternative.

Product certificate information can be pre-registered in advance, allowing customs brokers to submit only:

  • Certifier ID
  • Product ID
  • Certificate Version ID

This method can significantly reduce repetitive data entry and support faster customs processing.

Both approaches rely on accurate, pre-prepared data that aligns exactly with the physical shipment.

New operational and data challenges

Importers now need to manage the intersection of multiple requirements at SKU level, for example combining US flammability rules for clothing, chemical restrictions on substances such as lead and phthalates, and labelling standards for fibre content, care instructions and safety warnings.

For fashion and lifestyle brands, that means building robust testing programmes, maintaining complete technical files and ensuring master data can be translated into CPSC-compliant certificate records without manual rework at the point of entry.

Regulators have signalled that they expect full compliance from the implementation date, with no broad indication of delayed enforcement.

Incorrect or incomplete eFilings can trigger automated customs holds, manual inspections, potential seizure or refusal of non-compliant shipments, and even civil penalties where systemic failures are identified. For time-sensitive sectors such as fashion and retail, where margins and calendars are already under pressure, even short delays at the border can undermine entire seasons or promotional campaigns.

Why exporters and origin teams matter

Although legal responsibility for eFiling sits with the US importer, a significant proportion of the required information resides with exporters, manufacturers and upstream partners.

Testing records, manufacturing details, lab certifications and product specifications are typically held at origin, and without structured access to this data, importers may struggle to complete mandatory filings accurately and on time. Exporters targeting the US market therefore need to map CPSC scope with their customers and embed electronic information sharing into standard shipping processes so certificate data is available well before cargo departs.

Turning compliance into an advantage

Businesses that invest early in mapping their CPSC exposure, closing testing gaps, building digital certificate libraries and rehearsing eFilings in test environments will move through the new regime with fewer delays and lower risk. 

Those that treat compliance as a last-minute paperwork exercise risk finding that missing or inconsistent data becomes a bigger threat than tariffs, capacity constraints or transport disruption.

Metro is already working with customers in fashion, retail, consumer goods and wider international trade to align product data, testing records, documentation and customs processes across origin and destination teams. 

If you import into the United States and want to turn the new CPSC eFiling rules into a competitive advantage rather than a source of disruption, EMAIL our Managing Director, Andrew Smith, directly. 

Top 20 cargo airports

Air freight stabilises, but elevated rates and uneven capacity remain

Jun 24, 2026 | ,

Air freight markets are showing signs of greater stability following the recent US-Iran peace agreement and the restoration of much of the disrupted Middle East network. 

However, while the crisis phase has eased, the market has settled into a new reality characterised by elevated rates, constrained capacity and strong demand from technology sectors.

Capacity is gradually returning, but not quickly enough to restore equilibrium. As a result, rates remain significantly higher than a year ago and supply chains continue to face a more expensive operating environment.

Recovery is underway, but the market remains tight

The reopening of airspace and the restoration of services through the Gulf have brought welcome relief. Major carriers have rebuilt much of their network and flight frequencies across the UAE and Qatar have increased steadily.

Yet the impact of the disruption has not fully disappeared. A large proportion of Asia-Europe traffic previously relied on Middle East hubs, and the loss of capacity earlier in the crisis created a structural imbalance that continues to affect the market.

Global freighter capacity has improved and some transpacific routes are approaching pre-disruption levels. However, capacity growth continues to lag demand growth. Over the past two years, cargo volumes have expanded by around 10%, while capacity has increased by only about 6%, leaving the market vulnerable to even modest disruptions.

Longer routings, restricted airspace and operational inefficiencies mean that available aircraft do not always translate into usable cargo capacity. This continues to underpin rates across key trade lanes.

Rates remain well above last year

Despite the return of additional capacity, pricing has proved remarkably resilient.

Global air freight rates have eased only marginally in recent weeks and remain more than 30% above last year's levels. Asia-Europe rates reached their highest point of the year during May before softening slightly, but remain around 50% higher than a year ago.

Volumes have grown by only low single digits, demonstrating that the current market is being driven more by restricted capacity than by explosive demand.

Weekly fluctuations continue, but the underlying balance between supply and demand remains tight enough to prevent any meaningful correction.

Technology and e-commerce continue to drive demand

Demand remains healthy rather than exceptional.

Growth is being supported by semiconductor production, AI infrastructure investment and high-value electronics shipments. Asia-Pacific volumes have increased by high single digits this year, while the flow of e-commerce cargo has also shifted as changing US regulations redirect some volumes towards European markets.

Forwarders report that demand broadly reflects global economic growth rather than a dramatic surge. However, with little spare capacity available, even moderate volume increases are sufficient to sustain elevated rates.

The summer contract season and continued integration activity among major logistics providers are also expected to support volumes during the second half of the year.

Fuel volatility remains a key variable

The easing of tensions in the Gulf has helped energy markets stabilise and jet fuel prices have fallen by around a quarter from recent peaks.

Fuel surcharges have responded with low double-digit percentage reductions, offering some relief to shippers. However, jet fuel prices remain more than 50% higher than last year's average and continue to represent a significant component of total transport costs.

While the US-Iran agreement reduces the risk of further disruption, energy markets remain sensitive and pricing mechanisms often lag underlying fuel movements, making budgeting difficult.

A firmer market, but a more predictable one

The air freight market has moved away from crisis conditions, but it has not returned to pre-disruption norms.

Capacity is recovering unevenly. Demand from technology and high-value sectors remains strong. Fuel costs continue to influence pricing, and rates are likely to remain above historical averages even if further softening occurs during the second half of the year.

For shippers, the challenge is no longer simply reacting to disruption, but adapting to a market that operates with less spare capacity and a permanently higher cost base.

Metro's air freight specialists work with customers every day to secure capacity, manage costs and build resilience into critical supply chains. If your business is facing rising airfreight costs, constrained space or time-sensitive challenges, EMAIL our Managing Director, Andrew Smith, directly.

LA terminal 1440x1080 1

Early peak season surge tightens Asia ocean freight markets

Jun 9, 2026 | , , , , , , , , ,

Peak season has arrived earlier than expected and it is already putting global container supply chains under strain, with tightening capacity, rising rates, and growing competition for space across both Asia–US and Asia–Europe trades.

What is typically a late summer surge has shifted forward into late May and early June, driven by a combination of geopolitical risk, rising fuel costs, and shipper behaviour. 

Importers are accelerating shipments to get ahead of expected surcharge increases, tariff uncertainty, and supplier price rises, while ongoing disruption in the Middle East continues to impact fuel markets and transit reliability.

Space from key Asia export gateways is now extremely limited, with bookings often required several weeks in advance and some premium services effectively sold out through June. At the same time, longer transit times and schedule unreliability on Asia–Europe services are encouraging shippers to move cargo earlier to avoid delays, adding further pressure.

Rates climbing across all trades

Carriers have responded quickly to strengthening demand, implementing peak season surcharges and rate increases from early June. Spot rates have risen sharply week-on-week across all major east–west trades, with the most pronounced increases seen on the transpacific.

Rates to the US West Coast have jumped by over 30% in a single week, while East Coast pricing has risen by around 20%. Asia–Europe trades have also seen strong upward movement, with increases of around 20–25% on key lanes into Northern Europe and the Mediterranean.

Compared to pre-crisis levels earlier this year, spot rates are now up 80% on transpacific routes and 45% on Asia–Europe trades, underlining the rate of the current market shift.

While further increases are expected through June, the pace may moderate slightly as carriers test shipper resistance to additional hikes.

Transpacific leads, Europe follows

Stronger carrier margins on the transpacific mean equipment and capacity are often prioritised for US-bound cargo first. Containers can then become tied up in inland US networks, delaying their return to Asia and reducing equipment availability for subsequent export cycles.

The result is a lag effect: tightening conditions and rate pressure seen first on the transpacific and then potentially feeding into Asia–Europe trades, contributing to growing equipment shortages and reduced space availability at origin.

Carrier strategy and contract pressure

Carriers are maintaining strict capacity discipline and showing a clear preference for higher-yield cargo. While many are still honouring contracted volumes, there are increasing reports of reduced allocations and limited flexibility for additional shipments.

For larger beneficial cargo owners, securing space remains possible within agreed volumes, but any incremental demand is typically subject to premium pricing. This dynamic is also cascading down to freight forwarders, as carrier behaviour towards major BCOs is increasingly reflected across the wider market.

At the same time, traditional contract structures are under strain. Greater use of surcharges, shifting pricing mechanisms, and reduced schedule reliability are making it harder for shippers to manage costs and plan effectively.

A more volatile peak season

This year’s peak season is not only early, it is also less predictable. Market conditions are being shaped by overlapping disruptions, from conflict-driven fuel volatility and potential tariff changes to ongoing network inefficiencies.

There are also signs that this level of volatility may persist. Recent rate spikes on the transpacific are among the largest recorded outside of major disruption periods, suggesting that the market is entering a more unstable phase rather than experiencing a short-term surge.

For shippers, the immediate priority is securing space and protecting supply chains. However, with capacity tight, equipment constrained, and rates still trending upwards, the risk of further disruption remains high as the peak season progresses.

Secure space before the market tightens further. Metro’s global carrier relationships and proactive capacity planning help you stay ahead of peak season disruption. To review your current shipping strategy or safeguard upcoming volumes, EMAIL our Managing Director, Andrew Smith directly.

container loading

Why more importers are rethinking FCL during peak season pressure

Jun 9, 2026 | , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Metro’s LCL Optimised Solution lets shippers move smaller, more frequent orders without paying for empty container space, freeing up working capital and easing the current squeeze on capacity.

As peak season tightens capacity across the major east-west container trades, many importers are reassessing whether shipping partially filled containers still makes commercial sense.

With space tighter, container equipment under pressure and freight markets increasingly volatile, Metro is seeing growing interest in flexible LCL (Less than Container Load) solutions that help businesses reduce costs, improve inventory flow and avoid paying for unused container space.

For many shippers, particularly those moving fluctuating or irregular cargo volumes, the traditional Full Container Load (FCL) model can tie up unnecessary working capital and create avoidable inefficiencies across the supply chain.

When LCL becomes more cost-effective

While FCL remains more cost-effective as shipment volumes scale, cargo volumes below 15 CBM are generally better suited to LCL solutions, while 15 to 20 CBM represents a tipping point where FCL and LCL options should be compared carefully.

That calculation becomes even more relevant during peak season periods, when under-utilised containers effectively mean paying premium freight rates for empty space.

However, the headline freight rate is only part of the picture. Many origin and destination charges, including customs clearance, documentation and terminal handling, apply whether cargo moves as FCL or LCL. The real saving often comes from avoiding under-filled containers and reducing indirect costs linked to excess inventory.

Metro’s LCL Optimised Solution

Metro’s Optimised Solution converts under-utilised 20′ and 40′ FCL shipments into LCL by loading cargo into Metro’s own consolidated containers alongside compatible freight from other customers. This improves container utilisation while giving customers access to guaranteed capacity during peak periods without paying for unused space.

Customers benefit from lower freight costs per cubic metre compared with similar volumes moving in partially filled FCL containers, alongside reduced administration and handling complexity through simplified pricing and regular consolidated departures.

Although LCL shipments naturally involve additional consolidation and deconsolidation handling, Metro’s priority processes for LCL conversions minimise disruption, reduce risk and maintain cargo integrity throughout the shipment process.

The overall result is a more flexible and commercially efficient shipping model for importers whose cargo volumes no longer justify dedicated FCL space on every movement.

Reducing inventory pressure and improving flexibility

Smaller and more frequent shipments help reduce the amount of cash tied up in bulk inventory while also lowering storage pressure and dwell time at origin.

Businesses gain greater flexibility to respond to changing demand patterns without committing to large inventory positions weeks or months in advance. In volatile market conditions, that flexibility can become a major operational advantage.

Metro’s regular consolidated departures also help customers reduce origin delays and improve supply chain responsiveness during periods of disruption, particularly when container shortages and rolling bookings are affecting traditional FCL movements.

As market conditions remain volatile and peak season pressure continues building, many importers are reviewing whether every shipment genuinely requires a full container, or whether a smarter consolidation strategy could unlock greater efficiency across the supply chain.

Metro’s Optimised LCL Solution helps customers reduce freight costs, free up working capital, secure guaranteed space and avoid paying for under-utilised containers during volatile market conditions.

If you would like to explore whether converting FCL shipments into Metro’s consolidated LCL solution could improve your supply chain efficiency, save money and improve your cash flow, EMAIL Key Account Director Jane Kenny.

Category: eCommerce

4PL | Chemical | Customs | eCommerce | Exports | Foodstuffs | Hazardous | Health | International Trade | News | Retail | Supply Chain | United States

Latest News in this category