Stressed businessman 1440x1080 1

Seven supply chain shocks in seven weeks

Feb 19, 2025 | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Just seven weeks into 2025, global supply chains have already faced a whirlwind of challenges.

From industrial action to trade barriers and shifting alliances, businesses must stay agile to navigate ongoing disruptions. Here are seven of the most impactful developments so far this year.

1. US east coast port strike averted (8th January)
A major disruption was narrowly avoided as the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) reached a tentative six-year agreement. The deal, approved on 7 February, prevented a strike that could have crippled US east coast ports for months. A final vote on 25 February will confirm its ratification.

2. Uncertainty over Suez Canal return (19th January)
Despite a fragile ceasefire in Gaza, container ships will not be returning to the Red Sea anytime soon. Carriers remain cautious, fearing renewed instability and prioritising the established Cape of Good Hope diversions. Even if ships do resume transit, severe disruption is expected, with schedules taking up to two months to stabilise.

3. Trump’s trade policies spark concerns (20th January)
Following his inauguration, President Trump swiftly reignited trade tensions, threatening tariffs on Colombia, China, Canada, and Mexico. Proposals include a 25% levy on steel and aluminium from Canada and Mexico, with reciprocal tariffs also being considered for UK imports. The potential trade war could have widespread consequences for global supply chains.

4. US air cargo demand under threat (1st February)
Trump’s decision to impose a 10% tariff on all Chinese imports and temporarily suspend the de minimis exemption for low-value Chinese shipments has sent shockwaves through the air freight sector. While the exemption was reinstated, changes to eCommerce regulations could significantly disrupt air cargo flows into the US, which is expected to receive 1.4 billion eCommerce packages this year.

5. New Asia shipping alliances reshape trade (2nd February)
The long-anticipated shift from three major container alliances (Ocean, THEA, 2M) to four key players (Ocean, Premier, Gemini, MSC) is now in effect. Asia-North Europe scheduled liner capacity will shrink by 11%, yet the number of weekly sailings will increase from 26 to 28. These changes will reshape global shipping networks for years to come.

6. European road freight rates stabilising (4th February)
After three years of decline, European road freight spot rates may have hit their lowest point. According to the European Road Freight Rate Benchmark, spot rates fell just 1% year-on-year in Q4 2024. While demand remains weak, cost pressures have kept rates 15% above pre-pandemic levels, with short-term volatility expected.

7. Carriers cut sailings to stabilise rates (14th February)
Shipping lines are aggressively blanking sailings to ease the transition to new alliance schedules and sustain freight rates. Between 17 February and 23 March, 51 sailings have been cancelled across key east-west trade routes, with February’s cancellations rising to 133 from 104 in January. Further capacity withdrawals and a general rate increase (GRI) could follow if demand fails to recover.

With trade disputes, shipping realignments, and geopolitical instability shaping global supply chains, the first quarter of 2025 has already presented significant challenges.

Staying ahead requires proactive strategy adjustments to mitigate risks and build resilience. That’s why we share these insights and why your Metro account management team is always by your side, ready to provide expert advice, share knowledge, and develop bespoke solutions tailored to your supply chain needs.

For high-level support, EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director.

MSC and Maersk 1440x1080 1

Gemini Cooperation’s bid to transform reliability

Feb 5, 2025 | , , , , , , , , , , , ,

As the Gemini Cooperation officially launches, its promise of 90%-plus schedule reliability through a hub-and-spoke network is under intense scrutiny.

Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd, the two partners in the venture, aim to address persistent reliability issues in container shipping, where schedule adherence has remained stubbornly low, fluctuating between 50% and 55% throughout 2024.

Gemini’s hub-and-spoke model, which involves central hubs facilitating feeder services to final destinations, is designed to optimise transit efficiency. By consolidating mainline services at designated hubs, the carriers seek to mitigate congestion-related delays that can plague conventional port-to-port operations. 

With 340 vessels and a combined capacity of 3.7 million TEUs, the Gemini network will eventually offer 57 interconnected services – 29 mainline routes and 28 regional shuttles – once fully phased in by mid-year.

Overcoming historical challenges

Achieving the ambitious 90% schedule reliability target remains a formidable challenge, given the industry’s historical struggles with port congestion and operational disruptions. 

While Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd have consistently outperformed the industry average, their own reliability in 2024 remained below 60%. By controlling key transshipment hubs Gemini aims to establish a more predictable flow of goods. 

External risks, however, remain beyond the carriers’ control. Congestion at key ports in China, including Shanghai and Ningbo, has intensified due to demand outpacing capacity growth. The ability of the Gemini model to navigate such disruptions will be crucial in determining its success.

A question of market adoption

Beyond operational feasibility, the long-term viability of Gemini hinges on whether shippers are willing to prioritise schedule reliability over cost savings. The model’s success will depend on whether customers are prepared to pay a premium for consistency, particularly in an uncertain 2025 market. While some shippers may value reduced inventory costs enabled by greater reliability, past efforts to introduce premium services struggled due to market fragmentation and price sensitivity.

With the majority of shippers valuing end-to-end reliability rather than just punctuality between hubs, the challenge for Gemini will be to demonstrate that its model can deliver comprehensive benefits across the entire supply chain.

An industry-first experiment

With competing alliances, Ocean Alliance, Premier Alliance and MSC continuing to favour traditional port-to-port networks, Gemini’s decision to embrace the hub-and-spoke model sets it apart. For ‘Ocean’ and ‘Premier’ it is more or less ‘business as usual’, with their service structure based upon the current setups. 

In particular ‘Ocean’s’ network remains largely unchanged, except for the re-launch of a seventh Far East to Europe service. Further to this, the alliance will add the South Chinese port of Yang- pu, on Hainan Island, to two of its Asia to North America loops. 

‘Premier’ mainly maintains the former THEA services and it will compensate the departure of Hapag-Lloyd by slot agreements with MSC on Far East to Europe services. Operationally, the partners will keep full control of ‘their’ loops, while retaining an existing Vessel Sharing Agreement with Wan Hai Lines in the Transpacific trade. ‘Premier’s’ largest member, ONE, will also continue a Transatlantic Vessel Sharing Agreement with the members of ‘Ocean’. 

With the network still in its early stages, industry observers remain divided on whether Gemini can deliver on its promises. Yet, if the venture achieves its ambitious targets, it could compel competitors to rethink their approach. The coming months will provide the first indications of whether this bold experiment will reshape global container shipping or simply become another ambitious but short-lived attempt at reform.

Metro negotiates rates and volume agreements with a broad portfolio of carriers, including MSC and the three major alliances, ensuring shippers have access to the widest range of service options, port pairings, and competitive rates. 

Our tailored ocean freight solutions reflect each customer’s unique requirements and expectations, delivering optimised logistics strategies. For expert guidance EMAIL Andy Smith, Managing Director, to review your situation and find the best solution for your supply chain.

Suez map

Container shipping braces for volatility as Red Sea routes beckon

Jan 23, 2025 | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

For over a year attacks on merchant vessels by Houthi militants has forced container carriers to reroute around the Cape of Good Hope. However, a newly established ceasefire and assurances from Houthi forces to limit attacks on non-Israeli vessels signal the possibility of a return to the Suez Canal route.

The ceasefire in Gaza and Houthi pledges to cease attacks on most vessels offer cautious optimism for carriers, who have stated that they will only return to Red Sea transits “when it is safe to do so”.

The assurance that ships will not be targeted, alongside a reduction in hostility towards vessels calling at Israeli ports, should pave the way for safer Red Sea transits.

However, the situation remains fragile. The Houthis have reserved the right to resume attacks should aggression occur in Yemen, and their targeting of Israeli-flagged or wholly Israeli-owned vessels persists. Furthermore, full implementation of the ceasefire agreement’s later stages is crucial for long-term stability.

Capacity oversupply threatens
While the reopening of the Red Sea route presents an opportunity to streamline shipping operations, it also introduces significant challenges.

Currently, close to 100% of container vessels avoid the Suez Canal, diverting around Africa and effectively removing over 12% of fleet capacity. This artificial tightening of capacity has driven freight rates to significantly higher levels in 2024, with spot rates more than tripling on some trades.

The return to shorter voyages through the Suez Canal will flood the market with capacity, dramatically altering the supply-demand balance. Analysts predict carriers will struggle to absorb the 1.8m TEU excess, with scrapping and slow steaming unlikely to offset the impact.

Operational challenges
Resuming Red Sea transits will also bring logistical hurdles. Carriers face the complex task of realigning schedules disrupted by the year-long diversions. Ships arriving earlier or later than expected at ports could lead to congestion and delays, adding to the strain on global supply chains.

Port congestion, particularly in Europe, is a key concern. A surge in vessel arrivals could overwhelm infrastructure, causing temporary backlogs that disrupt the smooth flow of goods. The shipping industry must also contend with record deliveries of new vessels, further compounding capacity issues.

While the reopening of the Red Sea route offers opportunities to reduce transit times and operational costs, the transition is unlikely to be smooth. The combination of excess capacity, volatile freight rates, and logistical challenges will create uncertainty in the short term.

With geopolitical risks casting uncertainty over the industry, building resilient supply chains, securing comprehensive cargo insurance, and managing budgets effectively will be essential for navigating the 2025 sea freight landscape.

In this volatile market, our marine insurance cover and fixed-rate agreements on key shipping routes help minimise risk and provide budgetary stability.

To discover how Metro’s insurance solutions and fixed-rate options can support your business in 2025, please EMAIL Managing Director Andy Smith.

New York port 1440x1080 1

USEC sea freight rates climb despite ILA strike resolution

Jan 23, 2025 | , , , , , , , , ,

The recent resolution of labour negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the US Maritime Alliance has averted a potentially disruptive strike across US East Coast and Gulf Coast ports. However, the last-minute nature of the agreement has left shippers contending with elevated costs, strained supply chains, and lingering uncertainties.

In anticipation of a strike, shippers front-loaded cargo to avoid potential port closures, causing a short-term surge in import volumes. Retailers moved spring merchandise earlier than usual, and many shifted inbound flows to US West Coast ports or secondary supply sources. While these actions ensured inventory availability, they also lengthened transit times, strained port operations, and drove up transportation costs.

Even with the strike threat resolved, the backlog of elevated volumes will take time to normalise. Some ports are already reporting delays as they work through the excess cargo, further tightening capacity and extending delivery schedules. This logistical ripple effect is compounded by pre-Lunar New Year demand, which has spurred additional shipments and intensified pressure on the supply chain.

Rising costs and capacity constraints
The surge in front-loaded cargo has led to significant rate increases on the transpacific trade lane. Spot rates to the US East Coast rose sharply, with increases exceeding 25% since mid-December. This upward trend, driven by demand spikes and tighter capacity, is expected to persist as carriers announce new general rate increases (GRIs) of up to $3,000 per 40ft container in February.

Moreover, these measures are creating downstream financial impacts for businesses. Elevated inventory levels, longer transit times, and higher transportation costs are affecting margins and working capital, particularly for goods sourced from Asia. Export sectors, including refrigerated and hazardous freight, are also facing acute challenges due to capacity constraints and mitigation actions by carriers.

The overall capacity situation on the Asia–USWC lane tells a more complex story. Carriers have deployed 1.34 million TEU for the four-week CNY period, representing a sharp 33% year-on-year increase and the highest capacity level in recent years and far outpaces current demand increases, creating a risk of oversupply.

Currently, only 9% of capacity has been blanked for the CNY period, well below the 23% blanked in 2024 and the pre-pandemic average of 19%. Historically, carriers have announced significant additional blank sailings closer to CNY and this pattern may repeat in 2025, although uncertainties around the phase-in of new alliance networks may complicate the picture

Strike resolution provides relief, but challenges persist
While the strike resolution has provided relief, ongoing geopolitical and seasonal pressures continue to shape market dynamics. The Lunar New Year holiday, which falls on 29 January, has spurred a wave of early shipments, exacerbating capacity challenges on the transpacific trade lane. Simultaneously, uncertainty surrounding the incoming US administration’s potential tariff increases has added urgency to shipments, further intensifying demand.

Geopolitical risks, such as tensions in the Red Sea and concerns about a renewed US-China trade war, remain a wildcard that could destabilise global trade flows. These factors, combined with already elevated freight rates and tight capacity, are likely to keep shippers on edge in the coming months.

The resolution of the ILA strike may have averted immediate disruption, but the ripple effects of front-loaded cargo, capacity challenges, and elevated freight rates will continue to impact supply chains in the months ahead. Metro is here to help you manage these complexities, offering real-time insights and effective strategies to keep your goods moving efficiently and cost-effectively.

EMAIL Managing Director Andrew Smith today to discover how Metro can protect and future-proof your supply chain in North America and beyond. Let us help you build a resilient strategy for 2025 and navigate the challenges ahead with confidence.

Category: Sea

4PL | Automotive | China | Customs | Sea

Latest News in this category