Hidden threat to exporters

Northern Europe’s Ports Struggle with Congestion Amid Network Shifts

Ports across Northern Europe are grappling with rising congestion, causing widespread delays and operational disruption. A confluence of industrial action, infrastructure strain, inland transport bottlenecks and the rollout of new shipping alliances is overwhelming terminals, with no immediate relief in sight.

Container volumes have surged at key gateways such as Antwerp-Bruges, Bremerhaven, Rotterdam, and Felixstowe, with waiting times and yard occupancy levels climbing.

Antwerp is experiencing yard utilisation at 96%, with reefer plugs over capacity at 112%.

Nearly half the vessels arriving are waiting for berths, and 52 more containerships are en route. Berthing delays are being exacerbated by residual backlogs following strikes at the end of March, and the port has reduced its export delivery window to five days to help ease pressure.

In Germany, Bremerhaven is seeing similar strain, with nearly 30% of vessels waiting for berths and inland rail disruptions further complicating the situation. Landslides and line closures near Hannover forced lengthy rail detours, impacting traffic to and from major ports including Hamburg, Rotterdam and Duisburg. These rail delays are causing a cascading effect across Northern Europe’s inland logistics.

The Netherlands is also under pressure, with unresolved automation disputes in Rotterdam contributing to labour-related delays. In France, strikes at Le Havre have eased for now during ongoing negotiations, but the risk of renewed action remains high.

The UK is not immune. Felixstowe, London Gateway, and Southampton are all dealing with congestion as vessel diversions from continental ports push volumes higher.

Multiple factors are compounding the problem. The phasing in and out of new alliance schedules—particularly by Maersk, MSC, and Hapag-Lloyd—is disrupting established flows and increasing port calls. Simultaneously, low water levels on the Rhine are limiting barge capacity, shifting more freight to already stretched rail and road networks. Labour shortages, especially during public holidays, have further constrained operations.

With delays mounting, carriers are urging shippers to collect containers promptly and to avoid early delivery of exports. Some terminals, like PSA Antwerp, have shortened delivery windows to reduce yard congestion. Carriers are implementing contingency plans on a vessel-by-vessel basis and may introduce congestion surcharges to offset rising operational costs.

Industry forecasts suggest that congestion could persist for another three to four months, until alliance network changes bed in and volumes normalise. In the meantime, importers and exporters should prepare for longer lead times, increased costs, and fluctuating capacity at Europe’s busiest container ports.

With congestion disrupting major European gateways, our flexible contingency plans are keeping cargo moving, rerouting through alternative ports and opening up new entry points.

To reduce delays and protect your supply chain, share your shipping forecasts early so we can act fast and proactively manage risks.

For expert advice and tailored solutions, EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director, today.

IMEC launch 1440x1080 1

IMEC: Europe’s New Trade Bridge to India

Launched as a strategic counterweight to China’s Belt and Road Initiative, the India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) is poised to reshape global trade flows between Europe, India, and beyond.

Backed by a coalition of world powers including the US, EU, India, and key Middle Eastern nations, IMEC promises to link South Asia with Europe through a multimodal network of ports, railways, and digital and energy infrastructure.

Announced during the G20 summit in New Delhi in 2023, the corridor will connect India’s western coast to Europe via the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Israel. From India’s planned Vadhavan deepwater port, ships would cross the Arabian Sea to Jebel Ali in the UAE, with cargo then moving by rail across the Arabian Peninsula to Israel’s port of Haifa. A final sea leg would take goods from the Mediterranean into European markets.

The corridor is designed to shorten transit times between India and Europe by up to 40%, with a summit of IMEC partners planned before the end of 2025 to present concrete initiatives.

With an estimated cost of $600 billion, IMEC also includes undersea data cables and pipelines for green hydrogen, making it as much an energy and digital connectivity play as a trade route.

Initial implementation has focused on India’s western coast, where the Modi government has greenlit the construction of the Vadhavan port. This $9 billion project is designed to handle mega-vessels and includes dedicated terminals for petroleum and automobile imports. Operational capacity is expected to reach nearly 300 million metric tons per year, with phased completion set for 2029.

From Europe’s perspective, IMEC opens up long-term opportunities to diversify supply chains, reduce reliance on volatile routes like the Suez Canal, and deepen strategic engagement with India. Transiting via Haifa not only provides a direct connection into the Mediterranean, but also serves as a hedge against disruptions in the Red Sea, including threats posed by Houthi rebel activity.

However, IMEC’s path is not without hurdles. Political instability in the region threaten the corridor’s viability and experts argue that normalised Saudi-Israeli relations would be key to securing the route, especially to ensure infrastructure security and cross-border cooperation.

India sees IMEC as central to its export-led growth model. Trade flows between India and Europe are forecast to grow by 6% annually through 2032, but current infrastructure cannot handle the expected increase. By offering a more direct and integrated pathway, IMEC positions India as a vital hub in global supply chains.

While financing remains a key challenge, particularly for European stakeholders juggling defence, energy, and industrial spending, IMEC’s geopolitical weight initially secured rare bipartisan backing in Washington. Although the project was launched during Joe Biden’s presidency, with strong US endorsement, the stance of the current administration toward international infrastructure projects remains less defined. Its evolving approach to global trade may not prioritise IMEC with the same intensity.

Images used under CC BY-SA 4.0
IMEC map
GODL-India

With India’s manufacturing capacity expanding and the IMEC corridor set to transform east–west trade, now is the time to re-evaluate your logistics strategy.

Metro is already investing in India’s future, helping global brands tap into a faster, more resilient, and sustainable trade route to Europe.

EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director, to explore how our on-the-ground expertise in India can future-proof your supply chain.

Parcel post 1440x1080 1

New Tariffs and the End of De Minimis

On 2 April 2025, President Donald J. Trump announced sweeping new tariffs, targeting approximately 60 countries, with China singled out for the most severe action. In response to retaliatory tariffs from Beijing, the United States escalated its own duties, ultimately imposing a 125% tariff on all imports from China, Hong Kong, and Macau, in addition to previously existing tariffs.

While the White House has not made extensive public statements on the topic of de minimis imports – the long-standing policy allowing goods valued under $800 to enter the U.S. duty-free – key guidance released on 2 and 8 April confirms that this exemption will soon be withdrawn for goods from China and Hong Kong.

Escalation of U.S. Tariffs on China
The first of the new tariffs took effect on 4 February 2025, when a 10% duty was introduced on top of the existing Section 301 tariffs. This was increased to 20% on 4 March, and then, on 2 April, President Trump announced a 34% reciprocal tariff, which included a new 10% baseline tariff applicable to all countries starting 5 April.

However, after China retaliated with increased tariffs on U.S. exports, the White House raised the China-specific tariff to 84% on 8 April, and then to a staggering 125% on 9 April. 

This final rate became effective at 00:01 ET on 10 April. These duties are stackable, meaning that in many cases, importers will face a total duty burden of around 145%, factoring in earlier Section 301 tariffs and the new reciprocal tariffs.

De Minimis Policy Changes for Chinese Imports
The de minimis exemption, which allows shipments valued at or below $800 USD to enter the United States without duties or import taxes, is being formally eliminated for goods originating from China and Hong Kong, effective 2 May 2025 at 00:01 ET.

This change follows a period of confusion that began on 1 February, when the White House first announced the end of de minimis for Chinese-origin shipments. 

Implementation on 4 February resulted in significant logistical disruptions, including a temporary halt in parcel acceptance by the United States Postal Service (USPS). The policy was reversed just one day later, on 5 February, to give U.S. authorities time to prepare for full enforcement.

Now, with updated executive orders on 8 April and 9 April, the de minimis exemption will definitively end for China and Hong Kong on 2 May. The administration is also considering extending these rules to Macau.

Starting on that date, goods valued under $800 from China and Hong Kong will be subject to a duty calculated at 120% of the item’s value, and a postal fee of $100 per package. 

The postal fee will rise to $200 on 1 June 2025. These amounts were increased from earlier planned levels of 30% duty and $25/$50 postal fees through the two April executive orders.

Additionally, the exemption will no longer apply to low-value goods shipped through couriers or freight companies—not just postal shipments—ensuring broad application across all shipping channels.

What’s Next?
While the de minimis threshold remains in place for most other countries, both the White House and members of Congress are reportedly reviewing broader changes to this policy. 

For now, the key changes apply specifically to China and Hong Kong, but the political momentum suggests the U.S. may tighten or eliminate de minimis privileges more broadly in the near future.

TIMELINE: Tariffs on China
1 Feb Trump announces elimination of de minimis for China (initially).
4 Feb 10% tariff imposed on Chinese and Hong Kong imports. No drawback or exclusion process.
5 Feb De minimis reinstated temporarily due to USPS overload and customs issues.
4 Mar Tariff on China doubled to 20%.
2 Apr Trump announces 34% reciprocal tariff on 60 countries, starting with China.
5 Apr New baseline 10% reciprocal tariff applies to all countries (excl China).
8 Apr After China retaliates, U.S. increases China tariff to 84%; raises de minimis duty to 90%.
9 Apr Tariff on China raised to 125%. De minimis duty rises to 120%.
10 Apr 125% China tariff becomes effective.
2 May End of de minimis for China and Hong Kong. New duties and postal fees apply.
1 June Postal fee increases for low-value shipments from China.

If you’d like to review any potential impact of tariffs on your supply chain, assess your exposure, or explore strategic options, we’re here to help. Metro is well-placed to support you, backed by our expanded US footprint and strong focus on North American trade flows.

Make informed decisions with Metro’s compliance and regulatory insights. EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director.

Trump on tv 1440x1080 1

Tariff turmoil threatens US importers as China trade takes a hit

After weeks of speculation, US President Donald Trump has sharply escalated tariffs on Chinese goods to 125%, while simultaneously offering a 90-day reprieve to other trading partners.

The baseline tariff of 10% applies to imports from all countries other than China, including the EU. This rate applies in addition to any existing tariffs, with certain exemptions in place for key sectors such as semiconductors, copper, lumber, pharmaceuticals, bullion, energy, and minerals not found domestically.

Meanwhile, the separate 25% tariff on automobiles and auto parts, introduced last month, remains in effect.

Tariffs of 25% also continue to apply to steel and aluminium imports across the board, alongside the existing 25% duty on goods from Mexico and Canada that do not comply with USMCA free trade agreement terms.

US retailers and importers are reacting quickly. Delaying or cancelling orders and turning to existing inventory while they wait for clarity. According to the National Retail Federation (NRF), the outlook for imports is bleak, with volumes expected to fall sharply in the coming months.

Data from Dun & Bradstreet shows that just 225,900 TEUs of US imports from Asia were booked in the past seven days, down from around 633,000 TEUs the week before. Purchase orders for fall and holiday merchandise are also being postponed by 30 to 60 days.

The NRF’s Global Port Tracker estimates a 20% year-on-year drop in US imports for the second half of 2025. June volumes are forecast to be the lowest since early 2023, with the downturn starting as soon as May. While the 90-day reprieve on non-China tariffs may cushion the blow, the wide disparity in duty rates between China and other Asian nations is already influencing global sourcing decisions.

With tariffs now exceeding 150% on some goods, many Chinese-made products are no longer viable in the US market. By contrast, the impact on goods from countries facing lower tariffs is less severe. A 10% duty typically translates to a retail price increase of around 3%, making these supply chains more resilient in the near term. As a result, sourcing is shifting rapidly towards countries like Vietnam and Taiwan, where the tariff environment is more favourable.

Despite the disruption, shipping lines remain cautiously optimistic. Many believe that once the tariff situation stabilises import volumes could rebound strongly during the peak late summer to autumn season.

Meanwhile, the administration appears to be refining its approach on another controversial measure. The proposed port fees of up to $1.5 million on Chinese-built or operated ships calling at US ports. Speaking before the Senate Finance Committee, USTR Jamieson Greer sought to ease concerns, indicating adjustments are being made to avoid damaging American export competitiveness.

“The president will look very carefully to make sure we have the right amount of time and the right incentives to create shipbuilding here without impacting our commodity exports,” Greer said.

Meanwhile, pressure is building on US Customs and Border Protection (CBP). The increased complexity of tariff codes and documentation is creating more manual processing work, and staffing levels have not risen in line with demand. There is growing concern that CBP could be overwhelmed if volumes rise suddenly or new duties are introduced.

For now, the only certainty is continued volatility. Trade flows are being redrawn, sourcing strategies are in flux, and the longer-term consequences of this tariff upheaval are only just beginning to surface.

We will share further updates as new details emerge, particularly around the EU and shifts in UK trade policy.

If you’d like to review any potential impact on your supply chain, assess your exposure, or explore strategic options, we’re here to help. Metro is well-placed to support you, backed by our expanded US footprint and strong focus on North American trade flows.

If we can help, or simply answer your questions, contact us now for prompt and tailored advice.