Vessel space from China tightens 1440x1080 1

Disciplined capacity management shaping CNY sea freight

As Chinese New Year approaches, sea freight markets from Asia to Europe and the United States are being shaped less by price competition and more by carrier control.

This year’s seasonal peak has arrived earlier than normal, with demand pulled forward and capacity actively withdrawn to protect network balance. While spot rates have eased after a brief pre-holiday lift, this is a short-term, seasonal adjustment rather than a shift in market fundamentals.

Seasonal patterns are moving forward

Historic Chinese New Year patterns place rate peaks two to four weeks before factory shutdowns. This year, those peaks have arrived earlier across all major east–west lanes.

On Asia–Europe routes, rate momentum has advanced by around two weeks, while trans-Pacific trades are peaking three to four weeks ahead of normal.

This shift reflects early shipping activity as exporters accelerated cargo flows into January, compressing the traditional pre-CNY cycle and bringing forward rate support.

Targeted blank sailings tighten supply

Carrier response has been swift and highly targeted. In the five-week window from weeks 04 to 08, carriers have announced 68 blank sailings from approximately 698 scheduled departures, equating to around 10% of planned capacity being withdrawn.

Blankings are concentrated where pressure is greatest:

– 47% on trans-Pacific eastbound services
– 38% on Asia–Europe and Mediterranean routes
– 15% on transatlantic westbound services

Despite these cancellations, around 90% of sailings remain scheduled to operate, underlining that capacity management is selective rather than disruptive.

After six consecutive weeks of gains on Asia–Europe trades leading into a seasonal mini-peak, spot freight rates now sit below early-2025 highs, reinforcing that recent movements reflect timing effects rather than a weakening market.

Reliability and disruption remain constraints

Operational performance continues to limit flexibility. Global on-time performance stands at 47%, down two percentage points month on month, with reliability slipping on both trans-Pacific and Asia–Europe routes.

Winter weather disruption in Europe and ongoing geopolitical uncertainty around key maritime corridors are adding further unpredictability to schedules.

As the market moves through Chinese New Year and into the post-holiday reset, carriers retain the tools to rebalance supply quickly, meaning any near-term easing should be viewed as temporary rather than structural.

Metro’s sea freight team is already modelling Jan/Feb blank sailings and CNY rush patterns, so we can secure space, optimise routings and build contingency plans around your specific flows.

By sharing your forecasts and critical SKUs early, we can ring-fence capacity, minimise disruption and shield you as far as possible from threatened GRIs and last-minute surcharges.

EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director, today to arrange a strategic review of your ex-Asia shipping patterns and lock in the resilience you need for CNY 2026 and beyond.

Chinese New Year 1440x1080 1

Asia–Europe peak season meets Chinese New Year

As the Asia–Europe trade moves deeper into peak season, Chinese New Year (CNY) is already reshaping pricing, capacity and execution risk. What was once a predictable seasonal slowdown has become a compressed, high-impact period where demand surges, capacity is tightly managed and disruption risks escalate quickly.

With carriers reporting strong bookings through December, into January and expectations that volumes could remain firm into February, the traditional pre-CNY rush is well underway. 

Although Chinese New Year officially begins on 17 February, with public holidays running from 15 to 23 February, its impact is felt weeks earlier as factories slow production and exporters pull cargo forward.

For Asia–Europe shippers, this creates a narrow and volatile planning window rather than a clearly defined seasonal pause.

Demand strength keeps rates elevated

Underlying demand on the Asia–Europe trade remains robust. Volumes reached nearly 22 million teu by the end of October, representing 8.6% year-on-year growth, giving carriers confidence to defend pricing as peak season converges with CNY planning.

This strength has translated into a fresh round of pricing actions at the start of the year. Peak season surcharges (PSS) and higher freight-all-kinds (FAK) levels are being used to reinforce rate floors as space tightens.

Market benchmarks reflect this momentum. Ahead of Christmas, Drewry’s World Container Index showed:

  • Shanghai–Genoa up 10%
  • Shanghai–Rotterdam up 8%, marking a third consecutive week of gains

Carrier initiatives followed quickly:

  • Maersk introduced a $1,500 per 40ft PSS on Asia–Mediterranean shipments from 5 January
  • CMA CGM applied a $250 per teu PSS on Asia–North Europe alongside new FAK rates from 1 January
  • MSC set new FAK levels of $3,700 per 40ft to North Europe and $5,500 per 40ft to the Mediterranean

Rates remain relatively steady heading into CNY, supported less by demand and disciplined capacity control.

Capacity front-loading raises execution risk

As factories prepare to slow production, carriers are once again turning to blanked sailings to protect utilisation. However, the way capacity is being managed this year marks a clear break from historical patterns.

Analysis from Sea-Intelligence shows that carriers have increasingly front-loaded capacity into late Q4 and early Q1, followed by plans for sharp withdrawals as the holiday approaches. This creates short bursts of intense volume flow, followed by sudden capacity gaps.

For shippers, this shift materially increases the risk of:

  • Rolled cargo
  • Missed cut-offs
  • Port and inland congestion during compressed loading windows

On Asia–Europe specifically:

  • Asia–North Europe has seen the largest absolute capacity expansion, with deployment projected to surge nearly 50% above baseline, reflecting aggressive inventory pull-forward into Europe
  • Asia–Mediterranean shows the greatest percentage volatility, with peak capacity more than 60% above baseline, highlighting heightened disruption risk even on secondary trades

Rather than smoothing demand, blank sailings are now amplifying disruption once volumes peak.

What happens after the holiday?

In the immediate run-up to CNY, pricing is likely to remain supported by strong demand, PSS and constrained capacity. The greater uncertainty lies in the post-holiday period.

Once factories reopen and deferred cargo returns to the market, rate volatility is likely to increase — particularly if demand rebounds faster than carriers reinstate withdrawn sailings. This could result in sudden space shortages, uneven service recovery and renewed congestion on Asia–Europe lanes.

For shippers, the real risk is not confined to the holiday itself, but to the broader six-to-eight-week window around CNY, when schedules, capacity and pricing are most fluid.

Planning priorities for Asia–Europe shippers

As peak season and CNY converge, successful shippers are focusing on:

  • Securing space early rather than chasing spot availability
  • Building contingency routing and sailing options
  • Allowing extra buffer in cut-offs and inland planning
  • Treating CNY as an extended risk period, not a single event

If you are planning ocean freight on the Asia–Europe trade through Chinese New Year and into 2026, Metro’s teams can help you secure space, manage blank-sailing risk and adapt your shipping strategy — so you stay ahead of disruption rather than reacting to it.

Suez convoy

When the Suez Canal Comes Back Online: Hidden Risks for Supply Chains

With hopes rising of stabilising conflict in the Red Sea region, analysts are increasingly considering what it would mean if shipping lines resume full use of the Suez Canal route, and it’s not all good news. 

While the shorter route from Asia to Europe might seem like a logistical boon, the modelling suggests there are several material pitfalls ahead that shippers need to be aware of.

Since late 2023, container shipping lines operating on Asia–Europe and Asia–North America routes have avoided the Suez Canal, opting instead to sail around the Cape of Good Hope. This detour has extended transit times and absorbed a significant amount of global container capacity. According to Sea-Intelligence, a full and immediate return to the Suez Canal could release up to 2.1 million TEU of capacity, equivalent to around 6.5 % of the global fleet, back into circulation.

However, this sudden release would create a powerful surge of imports into Europe. Modelling suggests that if all carriers reverted to Suez routing at once, inbound volumes from Asia could double for a period of up to two weeks, pushing overall port handling demand almost 40 % higher than previous peaks. 

Even if the transition were more gradual, spread over six to eight weeks, European ports would still face throughput levels around 10 % above historical highs, straining terminal operations, inland connections, and storage capacity.

Key Areas of Risk

  • European Port Congestion and Hinterland Strain
    European ports are already under pressure. A sudden import surge could stretch terminal capacity, yard space, and inland networks, leading to delays, higher handling costs, and increased demurrage.
  • Short-Term Disruption Despite Long-Term Gains
    While the Suez route offers shorter transits and lower fuel use, the transition back is complex. Network structures have been rebuilt around the Cape, and reverting will require major re-engineering, with temporary schedule changes and service disruption.
  • Lingering Risk and Insurance Costs
    The security issues that diverted ships from Suez persist. Even after reopening, residual war-risk premiums and contingency measures could keep operating costs elevated.
  • Capacity Overshoot and Rate Pressure
    Releasing 2.1 million TEU of capacity is likely to swing supply–demand balance, pushing rates down and while shippers may benefit in the short-term, it is likely that carriers would take drastic action to protect margins.
  • Timing and Readiness
    The timing of a full return remains uncertain. Analysts stress that rushing back before networks and ports are ready could trigger fresh disruption rather than restoring stability.

Metro’s sea freight team are already modelling reopening scenarios to ensure capacity, routing, and contingency plans are ready when trade flows shift back through the Suez Canal. 

EMAIL Managing Director, Andrew Smith to arrange a strategic review of your shipping patterns, risk exposure, and options to protect service continuity and cost efficiency when routes realign.

US chess piece over map and graph 1440x1080 1

U.S. Power Plays Shape Global Climate and Asian Trade Policy

The United States exerted its influence on two critical stages this month, by blocking consensus on global maritime climate regulation in London and sealing a series of trade pacts across Southeast Asia. 

At the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in London, U.S. pressure proved decisive in delaying adoption of a new net-zero emissions framework for shipping. After weeks of tense negotiation, the vote to postpone the measure by one year passed narrowly, with 57 in favour and 49 against, derailing what would have been the industry’s first global carbon-pricing mechanism.

The U.S. argued that the proposed levy on maritime emissions would raise consumer costs by around 10%, and threatened sanctions, visa restrictions, and port fees against nations voting in favour. Backed by Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Venezuela, the U.S. successfully persuaded several key flag states to withdraw support, effectively halting progress on a binding framework.

The decision has angered environmental groups and investors seeking a predictable framework for green fuel investment. Analysts now warn of fragmented regional carbon schemes, slower progress on decarbonisation, and renewed dominance of liquefied natural gas (LNG) as the default transition fuel.

However, the delay appears to have done little to dent the industry’s confidence. In the two weeks since the IMO vote, shipping lines have continued to place significant new-build orders, with the containership order-book ratio surpassing 33% of the global fleet for the first time since 2009. 

More orders are expected in the coming weeks as carriers push ahead with long-term fleet renewal plans, signalling sustained appetite for capacity growth despite regulatory uncertainty.

Trump’s Asia Tour: Trade Wins and Strategic Balancing

Even as Washington disrupted global climate diplomacy, President Donald Trump was securing new trade concessions across Southeast Asia. During his recent tour, the U.S. concluded four separate deals aimed at deepening regional economic ties and diversifying away from China.

  • Vietnam agreed to maintain 20% tariffs on U.S. goods but will move toward zero tariffs on selected products. The two countries will also cooperate on digital trade, export-control enforcement and anti-evasion measures.
  • Thailand retained its 19% tariff rate but committed to eliminate duties on 99% of U.S. goods, opening a broad range of consumer and industrial markets.
  • Malaysia and Cambodia went further, signing comprehensive reciprocal agreements that cap ad valorem tariffs at no more than 19%.

U.S.–China: A Cautious Thaw

Trump’s whirlwind tour culminates on Thursday 30 October with a long-awaited meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, their first in six years. The two leaders will meet on the sidelines of an Asia-Pacific summit, where negotiators have already framed a tentative agreement that would halt new U.S. tariffs and ease Chinese export controls on rare-earth minerals, which are essential for EVs, semiconductors and defence technology.

With U.S. trade agreements, compliance requirements, and sustainability regulations evolving fast, Metro can help you assess exposure and opportunities, maintaining compliance and resilient supply chains. 

EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director, to review the latest policy impacts and ensure your business stays aligned with shifting global trade and environmental frameworks.