Is short sea Brexit proof

Why container transit times matter

The circulation of container equipment and vessel schedule reliability continues to be a struggle, with our own analysis confirming that transit times from key origins increased by an average of 14 days and while some improvements have been made, we expect these to be undermined by the Yantian and Ningbo terminal closures.

Aside from the pandemic itself, there is not a single root cause for the continued supply chain disruption we are facing. The situation is an intertwined blend of port congestion, vessel shortages and schedule disruption, container equipment shortages, chassis shortages, rail shortages, and driver and truck shortages. This is a Global situation and not unique to the UK and Europe further magnifying the impact at every supply chain ‘touch point’ of a container movement in transit.

However, there is not really a shortage in the number of containers and vessels available to handle the amount of cargo in need of shipping.

The real problem is that it now takes much longer to move the cargo (and the equipment carrying it) which removes large amounts of capacity and that is what creates the shortage in the number of containers and vessels available.

Without enough capacity to move cargo in need of transport, freight rates surge as shippers decide not to risk losing the sale of the cargo against paying elevated rates to try to ensure their product arrives into market for manufacture or sale, or both.

The long list of global operational challenges in 2021 is keeping the level of available vessel and equipment supply under severe pressure, including port congestion, bad weather delays, labour disputes, shortages of truckers, Suez, Yantian, Ningbo, insufficient rail capacity, empty box shortages in key locations, and quarantine and social distancing in terminals, depots, warehouses, and for vessel crews.

All these elements combined slow down the circulation of container equipment and slow down the progress of vessels travelling from port to port.

Only about 40% of container ships arrived on time in the first quarter of 2021, with average delays stretching to more than six days, which is far behind pre-pandemic reliability levels of 70%.

Our review of four key China origins - Ningbo, Qingdao, Shanghai and Yantian - confirms that between last October and February 2020 transit times from each origin had increased by an average of 14 days and while some improvements have been made, we expect these to be undermined by the recent terminal closures at various Chinese ports and throughout Asia.

When carriers report on transit times they do so based on pier to pier, or quay to quay,  performance and do not take into account vessels held at anchor, the time taken to unload the vessel and make containers available for collection, or the inland leg to final delivery.

It is also worth noting that carriers do not take into consideration omitted ports and what happens to consignments that are offloaded en-route, or transhipped as a result to the final destination.

For shippers, any lost days are critical, because they have inventory (and cash) potentially tied up for extended periods, waiting for containers to arrive, unload and progress through to delivery.

Higher freight costs and delays are particularly hard for smaller businesses, with less stock on hand, to buffer supply disruption, which is why we have worked so hard to expedite the movement of landed containers to delivery. With the average time of 7 days between container arrival and final delivery, being maintained from August 2020 to last month. However even this element of a container movement is being disrupted with the inland issues with well-publicised driver shortages over recent months.

Metro negotiate rate and volume agreements with carriers across all three alliances, which means we can access the widest pool of equipment and offer shippers the biggest range of service offerings, port-pairings and rates.

Our fixed validity contracts provide supply chain security and peace of mind, but with space and equipment in such short supply, we recommend a minimum of four weeks visibility and booking window, to secure space on the vessel and get the right equipment positioned.

We will always keep you informed of the market situation and provide clear guidance on alternative options for critical cargo, when necessary.

Please contact Elliot Carlile or Grant Liddell to learn how we can support your supply chains, even in the most challenging market conditions.

FIATA FBL

Metro successfully test new eBL with FIATA

Metro continues to actively support the development and adoption of emerging technology, across the shipping industry, by participating in the successful testing of new e-FIATA Bill of Lading (eFBL) standard, with FIATA , the trade association for 40,000 freight forwarding and logistics firms in 150 countries.

The COVID19 pandemic has highlighted the urgent need for adoption of the digital version of one of the most important trade documents – the bill of lading. 

At ports and terminals around the world, goods cannot be released because the paper bill of lading is not there due to border restrictions, changes to the cargo’s routing, or people cannot physically stamp the document.

The ongoing disruption to trade, transport and the movement of documents, means that the digitisation of physical shipping documents is becoming much more significant

Several solution providers and carriers have offered proprietary versions of eBLs but the lack of standardisation has prevented large-scale adoption. 

Metro’s tech experts work with the United Nations Centre for Trade Facilitation and Electronic Business (UN/CEFACT), to harmonise trade documents and the exchange of information in the supply chain

In 2021, FIATA will release its eFBL standard, which is based on the UN / CEFACT Multimodal Transport Reference Data Model, to ensure interoperability with other standards and most systems. 

From a trust perspective we definitely see value in the document audit trail and the possibility for stakeholders to check the validity of documents.” 

Simon George, Technical Solutions Director, Metro Shipping

Earlier this month FIATA’s eFBL was tested by Metro, other freight-forwarding companies and software providers, as part of a proof of concept, aiming to make the open source standard available to all.

As part of the concept testing, Metro’s operations system generated a document that went electronically to FIATA’s servers, made an entry containing ‘issue date’ and ‘issued by’ as well as the document itself, which then sent back a FIATA bill of Lading  directly into our operations system.

FIATA really appreciate Metro’s assistance, in testing the electronic FIATA Bill of Lading issuance, sharing and verification processes. The detailed feedback will ensure our eFBL solution does answer to the needs of members around the world.

Lucelia Tinembart, Digital Projects Officer, FIATA

FIATA is going even further by testing a tracking solution for its documents, which will allow full traceability, through a unique QR code and number attached to each document. This will enable all parties interacting with an eFBL to verify the validity of the document, the integrity of its content, as well as the identity of its issuer, by scanning the QR code or uploading the PDF on FIATA’s website. 

Full implementation is planned to start in Q3 / 2021.

Metro believe that Blockchain, machine-learning and emerging technologies are the future of international trade. That’s why we work with UN/CEFACT and FIATA: to harmonise the exchange of information in the supply chain; and develop digital capability with critical documents like eBL’s.

For specific information, or to discuss how our technology could support your supply chain, please contact Simon George our Technical Solutions Director.

Ningbo

Global vessel congestion and schedule delays grows further after Ningbo closure

Just two weeks since the Ningbo-Zhoushan containers terminal closed after a worker tested positive for COVID-19 and container port congestion has spread across China and many other regions.

Data from consultancy eeSea highlights how global container port congestion has grown over the past fortnight in China and neighbouring nations, yet has momentarily eased in Europe. Not unsurprising as there is a lag between departure and arrival of vessels, as they transit from Asia to Europe, so we may see impacts in coming weeks, as delayed vessels begin to arrive.

The maps show congestion today versus two weeks ago, with 48 container ships currently waiting at Ningbo-Zhoushan and a percentage of 65% of vessels waiting versus in port.

Shanghai is inching upwards, at 52%, and Yantian (68%), Hong Kong (55%) and Shekou/Chiwan (67%) are also on an upwards trend. Busan, which is usually quite low, is now at 70%, with 14 vessels waiting outside.

The average number of weekly port calls to Ningbo fell 22% from 188 container vessels to 146 in the first week of closure, but the total vessel capacity calling at the port only dropped 7.8%, because the other four terminals at the port absorbed the inbound and outbound container traffic redirected from Meishan.

Outside of east Asia, there has yet to be a major spill over from the Ningbo closure into other Asian ports. The port authority in Ningbo-Zhoushan is slowly implementing a reopening of its Meishan terminal, a facility which accounts for around 20% of the approximate 30m teu that pass through the port annually.

Throughput will be increased in phases to reduce the backlog of containers, with resumption of container gate operations due to start yesterday and a full reopening scheduled for the 1st September. This will take time to filter through into carrier schedules and reliability and will not be an immediate ‘fix’.

Chinese authorities have been stringent with COVID testing. Many ports (and airports) are requiring nasal swab tests for entire crews, forcing vessels to remain outside the harbour until negative results are confirmed. And many ports are requiring vessels to quarantine for two to four weeks if they were previously berthed in India, where the delta variant surged during the summer and continues to have an impact throughout Asia.

The risk of a coronavirus outbreak at Chittagong port is rising as the presence of the deadly virus was detected in the crews of two vessels in the last week and a crew member of the 11,000TEU YM TRAVEL, was tested positive for COVID-19, resulting to schedule delays for its transpacific service. This is in a country that is only just coming out of strict government  lockdowns and has huge issues with congestion already at the port, which is also having a huge impact on aviation from Dhaka globally as ocean freight delays prevail.

India’s worst-ever sea freight capacity crunch has led to skyrocketing freight rates and a sold-out spot market to Oceania, West Africa, North and South America, as well as Europe. Carriers have announced a number of general rate increases and peak season surcharges (PSSs) which have seen freight rates double since July.

Retailers and other importers are increasingly trying to switch from ocean to air transport to make up for huge production slowdowns in Vietnam due to COVID-19, with air freight rates rapidly escalating because of the spike in demand.

The shift to air follows the Vietnamese authorities response to rising numbers of COVID-19 cases in the south, in extending by a month stringent controls on movement that have crippled factory production and sharply reduced freight activity at ports and airports. Many factories remain closed.

According to the Vietnam Textile and Apparel Association, nearly 90% of the industry’s supply chain has been significantly impacted by the partial lockdowns, with up to 80% of garment and textile companies in the southern provinces completely halting production. In the north, about 20% to 30% of the textile and apparel suppliers have halted production.

COVID-19 is also affecting Cambodia, which is complicating land-air shipments via Saigon and Bangkok. The rate from Thailand’s capital has more than doubled from pre-pandemic norms.

Our commercial and operations teams work closely with our partners across Asia and while we expect the situation in Ningbo and surrounding ports will improve, as Meidong reopens properly, we will continue to assess its impact on a shipment by shipment basis.

For urgent and must have shipments from Asia, we have access to freighter capacity from our Sea/Air hub in Singapore and can move consignments of up to 200cbm per flight to Europe as an alternative to restricted pure air freight services from many origins.

If you have any questions, concerns, or would like any further information regarding any of the issues raised here, please don’t hesitate to contact Elliot Carlile or Grant Liddell.

Ningbo 1

Ningbo container terminal to reopen

Ningbo Meidong Container Terminal will open tomorrow, having suspended all operations early last Wednesday morning after a port worker tested positive for COVID-19. Local sources now advise that the Meishan Island container terminal will restart operations from 18th August.

Despite the Ningbo port authority claiming that it had been able to work at 90% capacity in recent days, many ships are switching to different terminals and AIS data shows around 50 container vessels waiting at the outer Zhoushan anchorage.

Operations were suspended after a 34-year-old worker at the Ningbo Meidong Container Terminal (part of Ningbo’s Meishan bonded area) tested positive for COVID. More than 90,000 people have been tested over the past week with no further positive cases reported.

We are receiving (as yet unconfirmed) news that Ningbo’s shuttered Meidong container terminal will start a phased reopening tomorrow.

To clear the backlog of cargo, no new cargo will be accepted until the 25th August, with normal operations resuming from the 1st September.

The timeline is similar to the way Yantian reopened in June and will be in accordance with China’s COVID-19 policies.

Though significant, the disruption at Ningbo is significantly less than that which followed the Yantian closure, for around a month in May.

Port authorities claim that container volumes at Ningbo-Zhoushan port averaged 77,000 TEU a day between Wednesday and Friday last week, equivalent to 90% of the daily average in July.

The Meidong facility — also known as the Meishan Island International Container Terminal (MSICT) — handled around 22% of Ningbo-Zhoushan’s total throughput of 28.7 million TEU last year.

We are now on day seven of the closure and ships are being diverted to other terminals in Ningbo and other ports, including Shanghai, which are already running at full capacity, in the aftermath of Typhoon In-fa, with some imposing restrictions limiting the number of people and containers entering port areas.

Gate-in for export containers at other Ningbo terminals is limited to two days before a vessel’s estimated time of arrival, although entry to the container yard can be up to three or four days depending on the situation.

The closure of the Ningbo Meidong terminal is likely to lead to problems with trucking as well, as average wait times are currently 2-4 days and you can add another day onto dwell time for every day Ningbo Meishan terminal is closed.

Our commercial and operations teams work closely with our partners across Asia and while we expect the situation in Ningbo will improve swiftly, after Meidong reopens, we will continue to assess its impact on a shipment by shipment basis.

For urgent and must have shipments from Asia, we have access to freighter capacity from our Sea/Air hub in Singapore and can move consignments of up to 200cbm per flight to Europe.

If you have any questions, concerns, or would like any further information regarding any of the issues raised here, please don’t hesitate to contact Elliot Carlile or Grant Liddell.